期刊文献+

经济政策不确定性与企业并购:中国的逻辑 被引量:19

Economic Policy Uncertainty and M&A:The Logic of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2004—2017年A股上市公司的并购发起事件为研究样本,考察了经济政策不确定性对中国上市公司并购行为的影响。基于现有研究提出的等待期权假说的逻辑,经济政策不确定性越高,企业发起并购的可能性就越低,并购绩效也越好。然而,基于中国数据,本文却发现不一致的结论:经济政策不确定性越高,并购绩效就越差。为了解释该现象,本文基于中国情景提出了柠檬市场假说:鉴于经济政策不确定性加剧了信息不对称,进而导致投资者更难判断并购的价值,并低估并购收益,形成了柠檬市场,抑制企业发起并购,尤其是抑制替代性投资机会多的公司发起并购(即逆向选择)。基于该逻辑,经济政策不确定性越高,企业发起的并购绩效就越差。本文从多个角度检验了柠檬市场假说。整体上看,柠檬市场假说可作为现有研究的重要补充。 This paper takes the 2004-2017 A-share listed company's M&A launch event as a research sample,and examines the impact of economic policy uncertainty on the M&A behavior of Chinese listed companies.Based on the waiting option hypothesis proposed by the existing research,the higher the economic policy uncertainty is,the lower the probability of the company launching the M&A is,and the better the M&A performance is.However,based on Chinese data,we find inconsistent conclusions.When economic policy uncertainty is high,the M&A performance is poor.To explain this phenomenon,this article proposes the lemon market hypothesis based on the Chinese institutional background.Given that economic policy uncertainty has exacerbated information asymmetry,which has made it more difficult for investors to assess the value of M&A,they will underestimate the value of M&A.Then a lemon market will be formed which inhibits the companies and especially those that have more alternative investment opportunities(i.e.,adverse selection)from initiating M&A.Based on this logic,the more uncertain the economic policies are,the worse the performance of M&A initiated by enterprises is.This article examines the lemon market hypothesis from multiple perspectives.On the whole,the lemon market hypothesis can be an important supplement to existing research.
作者 黄灿 俞勇 郑鸿 HUANG Can;YU Yong;ZHENG Hong(Guangdong University of Technology,510520;Guangdong Utrust Investment Holding Co.,Ltd.,510045;Renmin University of China,100872;Tsinghua University,100084)
出处 《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第8期95-109,共15页 Finance & Trade Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“股东关系网络与企业创新:基于股东异质性的视角”(71902040) 广东省软科学面上项目“广东科技金融发展思路与对策研究”(2020A1010020036) 广东省自然科学基金项目“‘强关系’抑或‘弱关系’?股东关系网络的影响机理研究:基于企业绩效的视角”(2018A030310572)。
关键词 经济政策不确定性 并购 等待期权 信息不对称 Economic Policy Uncertainty M&A Waiting Option Information Asymmetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献124

  • 1张维迎,柯荣住.信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析[J].经济研究,2002,37(10):59-70. 被引量:996
  • 2温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7788
  • 3余明桂,夏新平,邹振松.管理者过度自信与企业激进负债行为[J].管理世界,2006,22(8):104-112. 被引量:413
  • 4[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104 被引量:1
  • 5[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June 被引量:1
  • 6[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972 被引量:1
  • 7[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321 被引量:1
  • 8[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619 被引量:1
  • 9[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182 被引量:1
  • 10[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312 被引量:1

共引文献8986

同被引文献327

引证文献19

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部