摘要
川楝子用药历史悠久,为常用理气止痛中药材,具有疏肝泄热、行气止痛、杀虫之功效,各地习用品多,为正本清源,对川楝子名称进行了考证,对历代本草所记载川楝,按照果实、叶、花的形态特征进行分析,得出历代本草中所记录的正品川楝子Toosendan Fructus即为历版中国药典所规定楝科植物川楝Melia toosendan Sieb. et Zucc.的果实,并对川楝子历代产地变迁、品质评价及道地性进行了概括,为川楝子开发利用提供依据。
Chuanlianzi has a long history of medicine, commonly used for regulating qi and relieving pain, It has the functions of soothing liver, relieving heat, moving qi, relieving pain and killing insects. There are many local supplies, for originating the source, investigated the name of Chuanlianzi, records of Chuanlianzi in ancient Chinese herb documents, analyzed the morphological characteristics of fruits, leaves and flowers, get the authentic Chuanlianzi(Toosendan Fructus) recorded in the ancient herb documents, It is a Chuanli(Melia toosendan Sieb. et Zucc.) plant’s fruit of neem family provised in calendar edition of Chinese pharmacopoeia.In addition, summarized the change of producing area, quality evaluation and Genuineness of Chuanlianzi, provided a basis for the development and utilization of Chuanlianzi.
作者
崔阔澍
李青苗
方清茂
詹志来
文跃强
杨文钰
李军
肖特
CUI Kuo-shu;LI Qing-miao;FANG Qing-mao;ZHAN Zhi-lai;WEN Yue-qiang;YANG Wen-yu;LI Jun;XIAO Te(College of Agronomy,Sichuan Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology,Ecology and Cultivation in Southwest China,Inistry of Agriculture,Chengdu 611130,China;Sichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Sciences,Chengdu 610041,China;National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica,China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences,Beijing 100700,China;Sichuan General Popularization Centre of Agricultural Technique,Chengdu 610041,China;School of Basic Medicine,Chengdu University of TCM,Chengdu 611137,China)
出处
《时珍国医国药》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2020年第4期874-877,共4页
Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research
基金
中央本级重大增减支项目(2060302)
公益性行业科研专项(201207002)
国家基本药物所需中药材种子种苗繁育基地建设项目
中央引导地方发展专项川产道地药材黄精规范化生产及精准扶贫示范推广(2018SZYD0003)
四川省“三区”科技人才支持计划科技人员专项计划(川科农[2019]11号)。
关键词
川楝子
道地性
本草考证
产地变迁
品质评价
Chuanlianzi
Genuineness
Herbal authentication
Changes of producing areas
Quality evaluation