期刊文献+

三级追踪管理法在提升护理不良事件管理水平中的应用研究 被引量:1

Study on the application of three-level tracking management method in improving the management level of nursing adverse events
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨三级追踪管理法应用于护理不良事件的管理效果。方法回顾性分析我院开展三级追踪管理法前(2017年1~12月)与开展后(2018年1~12月)住院患者临床资料,分别将其纳入对照组(n=279)与观察组(n=232),比较两组患者护理不良事件发生情况及上报情况差异。结果观察组患者护理不良事件总发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者护理不良事件规范上报率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论三级追踪管理法能有效降低护理不良事件发生率,并有效提升护理不良事件规范上报率,值得推广。 Objective To explore the effect of three-level tracking management method in the management of nursing adverse events.Methods The clinical data of hospitalized patients before(January to December 2017)and after(January to December 2018)the three-level tracking management method method were retrospectively analyzed.They were included in the control group(n=279)and the observation group(n=232)respectively.The occurrence and reporting of adverse nursing events between the two groups were compared.Results The total incidence of adverse nursing events in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The standardized reporting rate of nursing adverse events in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The three-level tracking management method can effectively reduce the incidence of nursing adverse events,and effectively improve the standardized reporting rate of nursing adverse events,which is worthy of promotion.
作者 李志敏 LI Zhi-min(Department of Obstetrics,Yangchun People′s Hospital,Guangdong Province,Yangchun 529600,China)
出处 《中国当代医药》 2020年第21期159-161,共3页 China Modern Medicine
基金 广东省阳江市医疗卫生类科技计划项目(社发[2018]89)。
关键词 三级追踪管理法 传统管理模式 护理不良事件 护理管理 Three-level tracking management Traditional management mode Nursing adverse events Nursing management
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献114

  • 1张小庄,叶宁,黄水清,罗坚,张国强,罗先琼.激励机制在增强医院不良事件主动报告中的作用研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2009,25(1):24-27. 被引量:18
  • 2应向华,陈洁,陈英耀.加强风险管理 保障病人安全[J].中国卫生质量管理,2005,12(4):1-3. 被引量:29
  • 3孙继伟.问题管理[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004:10. 被引量:5
  • 4Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations Joint Commission. International Accreditation Standards for Hospital[M]. Joint Commission Resources (Chicago), 2013: 3-5. 被引量:1
  • 5BarachP, Small S D. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps:lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems [J]. BMJ, 2000, 320(7237): 759-763. DOI, 10.1136/bmj. 320. 7237. 759. 被引量:1
  • 6Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, et al. The Canadian adverse events study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada[J]. CMAJ, 2004, 170 (11) : 1678-1686. DOI: 10. 1053/emaj. 1040498. 被引量:1
  • 7Pham JC, Aswani MS, Rosen M, et al. Reducing medical errors and adverse events [J].Annu RevMed, 2012(63): 447-463. 被引量:1
  • 8Despins LA, Scott -Cawiezell J, Rouder JN. Detection of patient risk by nurses: a theoretical framework[J]. J Adv Nuts, 2010, 66 ( 2 ) : 465 - 474. 被引量:1
  • 9Nielsen K.I, Pedersen AH, Rasmus- sen K, et al. Workrelated stressors and oceur- rence of adverse events in an ED [J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2013, 31(3) : 504 -508. 被引量:1
  • 10Wagner LM, Castle NG, Handler SM. Use of HIT for adverse event reporting in nursing homes: Barriersand facilitators [J 1. Geriatr Nurs, 2013, 34(2) : 112 -115. 被引量:1

共引文献258

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部