摘要
反诉制度是我国民事诉讼中一项重要的制度,2015年《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民事诉讼法〉的解释》第233条第1款规定:“反诉当事人应当限于本诉当事人的范围。”可见立法并没有关于反诉主体范围的明确规定,而且学界坚持严格限制反诉当事人范围的立场,但民事诉讼实务对民事反诉主体范围的扩张展开了积极的探索,将反诉之主体扩张到第三人。为解决立法与实务中的矛盾,完善反诉主体范围的规定,首先应明确符合反诉条件的第三人可以参与反诉,其次在规范第三人反诉的边界时,要结合客观范围,厘清第三人主体资格的具体判断标准。明确第三人作为反诉当事人的适格条件,使得反诉制度发挥出其应有的作用。
The counterclaim system is an important system in China s civil litigation.In 2015,the Supreme People s Court s Interpretation of the Application of the“Civil Procedure Law of the People s Republic of China”Article 233,paragraph 1 regulations:“The counterclaim parties should be limited to the scope of the parties to the complaint.”It can be seen that the legislation does not have clear provisions on the scope of the counterclaim parties,and the academic community adheres to the position of strictly restricting the scope of the counterclaim parties,but the civil litigation practice has expanded the scope of the civil counterclaim subjects.Active exploration will expand the main body of the counterclaim to a third party.In order to solve the contradiction between legislation and practice,and improve the provisions of the scope of the counterclaim,first of all,it should be clear that a third party who meets the conditions of the counterclaim can participate in the counterclaim,and secondly,when regulating the boundary of the third party s counterclaim,the third party s subject qualification should be combined with the objective scope to clarify the specific judgment standards,clarify the qualified conditions of the third party as a counterclaim party,so that the counterclaim system can play its due role.
作者
方泽琦
Fang Zeqi(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2020年第4期143-151,共9页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词
第三人
反诉当事人
主体范围
第三反诉
Third Party
Counterclaim Party
Subject Scope
Third Counterclaim
