期刊文献+

即时检测技术在急诊胸痛患者危险程度评估中的诊断价值

Diagnostic value of point-of-care testing in risk assessment of patients with emergency chest pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨即时检测技术(POCT)在急诊胸痛患者危险程度评估中的诊断价值。方法选取2016年10月~2018年10月北京核工业医院急诊科收治的180例急诊胸痛患者作为研究对象,根据其检测方法不同分为观察组(n=100)和对照组(n=80)。观察组采用POCT技术检测相关指标,对照组采用常规实验室方法检测相关指标。比较两组急诊滞留时间、标本检测时间、检测报告临床处置时间,并评估POCT检测准确性、抢救成功率、心血管事件发生率、复检准确率。结果观察组急诊滞留时间、标本检测时间、检测报告临床处置时间、住院时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两种方法诊断致命性胸痛的灵敏性、特异性、准确性相比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组抢救成功率、复检准确率高于对照组,而心血管事件发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论POCT技术应用于急诊胸痛患者中,快捷可靠,可准确评估其危险程度,提高抢救成功率、复检准确率,减少心血管事件。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of point-of-care testing(POCT)in the risk assessment of patients with emergency chest pain.Methods From October 2016 to October 2018,180 patients with emergency chest pain treated in emergency department of Beijing Nuclear Industry Hospital were selected as the research objects.They were divided into observation group(n=100)and control group(n=80)according to its detection method.The observation group used POCT technology to detect the relevant indicators,and the control group used the conventional laboratory method to detect.The emergency detention time,specimen detection time and clinical treatment time of detection reports were compared between the two groups.The emergency retention time,specimen detection time,detection report clinical disposal time of the two groups were compared,and the accuracy of POCT detection,the success rate of rescue,the incidence of cardiovascular events,and the accuracy of reexamination were compared between two groups.Results The emergency retention time,specimen detection time,clinical treatment time and hospitalization time of the observation group were all shorter than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of the two methods were not statistically significant,the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The success rate of rescue and the accuracy of reexamination in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,while the incidence of cardiovascular events was lower than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of POCT in patients with emergency chest pain is fast and reliable.It can accurately assess the dangerous level,improve the success rate of rescue and the accuracy of retest,reduce cardiovascular events.
作者 李秀力 梅蕊 LI Xiu-li;MEI Rui(Department of Emergency,Beijing Nuclear Industry Hospital,Beijing102413,China)
出处 《中国当代医药》 2020年第20期58-61,共4页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 即时检测技术 急诊 胸痛 危险程度 指导价值 Point-of-care testing Emergency Chest pain Dangerous level Guidance value
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献120

  • 1杨俊,王冠,吴晓芬,全小庆,阮磊,缪建平,袁俊强,张存泰.床旁联合检测NT-proBNP、cTnT、D-二聚体在心血管急症早期诊断中的价值[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2015,23(1):64-68. 被引量:16
  • 2王小艳.急性冠脉综合征后6个月死亡和心肌梗死的预测:前瞻性的多国观察性研究(GRACE)[J].中国处方药,2006(11):25-26. 被引量:138
  • 3NORGAARD B, MOGENSEN CB. Blood sample tube transporting system versus point of care technology in an emergency depart- ment; effect on time from collection to reporting? A randomised trial[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2012, 20: 71. 被引量:1
  • 4RAMLAWI M, DELEMONT C. Emergency department point of care testing: what are the benefits and for which patients[J]. Rew Med Suisse, 2011, 7(305): 1584-1587. 被引量:1
  • 5ZHONG W, CHEN MH, YANG F. Effect analysis of the test critical value in clinical application[J]. Life Science Journal, 2014, 11(1): 289-291. 被引量:1
  • 6TOMONAGA Y, GUTZWILLER F, LSCHER TF, et al. Diag- nostic accuracy of point-of-care testing for acute coronary syn- dromes, heart failure and thromboembolic events in primary care:a cluster-randomised controlled triM[J]. BMC Fam Pract, 2011, 12: 12. 被引量:1
  • 7COLLINSON P, GOODACRE S, GAZE D, et al. Very early di- agnosis of chest pain by point-of-care testing:comparison of the diagnostic efficiency of a panel of cardiac biomarke compared with troponin measurement alone in the RATPAC trial[J]. Heart, 2012, 98(4): 312-318. 被引量:1
  • 8KONINCK ASD, DECKER DK, BOCXLAER JV, et al. Analyti- cal performance evaluation of four cartridge-type blood gas ana- lyze[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2012, 50(6): 1083-1091. 被引量:1
  • 9LEINO A, KURVINEN K. Interchangeability of blood gas, elec- trolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2011. 49(7/: 1187-1191. 被引量:1
  • 10Durand AC, Gentile S, Devictor B, et at. ED patients: how nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literature[ J]. Am J Emerg Med ,2011,29 ( 3 ) :333-345. 被引量:1

共引文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部