摘要
目的探讨宫颈炎症感染不同微生物检验方法的效果及其对并发宫颈病变的诊断价值。方法选取2015年1月至2018年12月三亚市中医院诊治的116例宫颈炎症感染患者为研究对象。取患者适量宫颈分泌物,分别采用培养法、镜检法和凝集法进行检测,对每种方法的检测结果进行统计分析,比较不同检测方法检出宫颈感染的致病菌、阳性率、假菌丝、菌丝、菌孢子比例,并对各种检测方法对于宫颈病变的诊断结果进行探讨。结果培养法、镜检法和凝集法检测宫颈炎症感染阳性率分别为88.8%(103/116)、74.1%(86/116)、69.8%(81/116),培养法检测阳性率显著高于镜检法、凝集法,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。培养法检测假菌丝、菌丝、菌孢子的阳性率均高于镜检法、凝集法,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3种检测方法中,培养法检测患者中的宫颈病变发生率高于镜检法、凝集法,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论培养法、镜检法和凝集法等均可以用于宫颈炎症感染的诊断检查,其中培养法检测的阳性率高于其他检测方法,并对患者并发宫颈病变有一定的预测价值。
Objective To study the effect of different microbiological test methods for cervical inflammation infection and its diagnostic value for cervical lesions.Methods 116 patients with cervical inflammation infection admitted to Sanya Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were selected as the research object.The vaginal secretions of the patients were detected by culture,microscopy and agglutination methods respectively.The results of each method were analyzed statistically.The pathogenic bacteria,positive rate,pseudohyphae,hyphae and spores of cervical infection detected by various detection methods were compared.The sub-ratio and the diagnostic results of various detection methods for cervical lesions were discussed.Results The positive rates of culture,microscopy and agglutination were 88.8%(103/116),74.1%(86/116)and 69.8%(81/116),respectively,with statistically significant differences between the methods(P<0.05).The detection rates of pseudomycelia,hyphae and spores by culture method were higher than those by microscopy and agglutination method,with statistically significant differences between the methods(P<0.05).Among the three detection methods,the incidence of cervical lesions among patients detected by culture method was higher than that detected by microscopy and agglutination method,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusions Culture,microscopy and agglutination methods can be used for the diagnosis of cervical inflammation infection.The positive rate of culture method is higher than other methods,and it has certain predictive value for patients with cervical lesions.
作者
黎世贵
李素芳
陈丽玲
LI Shigui;LI Sufang;CHEN Liling(Laboratory Department,Sanya Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Sanya 572000,Hainan,China)
出处
《中国性科学》
2020年第6期43-46,共4页
Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
关键词
宫颈炎症感染
宫颈病变
培养法
镜检法
凝集法
Cervical inflammation infection
Cervical lesions
Culture
Microscopy
Agglutination
