摘要
缔约过失责任与合同成立与否以及合同的效力状态并无关系。在因欺诈行为导致合同不成立或合同无效、被撤销,乃至合同成立并有效存在的情形,受欺诈方均可以要求在缔约阶段实施欺诈行为并导致其遭受损失的缔约方承担缔约过失责任。否认合同有效情形下缔约过失责任适用的可能性,并无正当性。对于合同有效情形下缔约过失责任的承担方式,主要以损害赔偿为主,受欺诈方也可以请求法院调整合同价款。
Liability for fault in contracting has nothing to do with whether the contract is established or not and the validity of the contract.In case the contract is not established or invalid or revoked due to fraud,or even the contract is established and exists effectively,the defrauded party may require the contracting party that has committed fraud and caused losses to bear the liability for fault in contracting.It is not justified to deny the possibility of the application of contractual fault liability under the condition that the contract is valid.As for the way to bear the liability for fault in contracting when the contract is valid,compensation for damages is the main method,besides,the defrauded party may also request the court to adjust the contract price.
作者
叶萍花
Ye Pinghua(South China University of Technology,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510000,China)
出处
《黑龙江工业学院学报（综合版）》
2020年第4期145-151,共7页
Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)
关键词
欺诈
合同效力
可撤销
缔约过失责任
损害赔偿
fraud
validity of contract
revocable
liability for fault in contracting
compensation for damages
