摘要
回到民族志文本本身是认识列维-斯特劳斯结构人类学的关键。在他看来,野蛮人有自己独特的“平衡术”。野蛮人对社会均衡追求的独特方式,不同于现代文明社会运用科学思维维护社会稳定平衡的路径——恒长性替换变动性,他们用来自心灵深处的感知维续着野性思维的运作,而科学与野性两种思维深处接续的正是列维-斯特劳斯结构主义的深层逻辑。两种思维无先后顺序,而是并行于现实时空;无孰优孰劣,而应弥合。在这弥合背后映射的则是人类学研究取向的亟待转换与“他者”之思。
Returning to the ethnographic text itself is the key to understanding the structural anthropology of Levi-Strauss.In Levi-Strauss’s view,the barbarian has own unique“balancing act”.The unique way in which barbarians pursue social equilibrium is different from the path that modern civilized society uses scientific thinking to maintain social stability and balance-substituting constancy for variability,which they use the perception from the depths of the soul to sustain the operation of savage thinking,and the deep connection of the two thinkings of science and savage is the deep logic of Levi-Strauss structuralism.The two kinds of thinking have no order,but parallel in real time and space;no good or bad,but should be bridged.What this bridging reflects is the thinking about“the other”and the urgent conversion of the anthropological research orientation.
作者
刘超
LIU Chao(Graduate School,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing,102488,China)
出处
《原生态民族文化学刊》
CSSCI
2020年第4期55-62,共8页
Journal of Ethnic Culture
关键词
“平衡术”
野性思维
现代科学思维
结构主义
“他者”
“balancing act”
Levi-Strauss
ethnography
savage thinking
modern scientific think⁃ing
structuralism