期刊文献+

戴维森的彻底解释的证据和限制条件分析

An Analysis on the Evidence and Constraints of the Radical Interpretation of Davidson
原文传递
导出
摘要 戴维森将真理理论应用于意义理论,他认为意义是公开可解释的。彻底解释理论关注其所依赖的证据,以及构建在该证据上的解释理论所需要满足的形式的和经验的限制。思想和语言是相互依存的,主体的思想表达依赖他所拥有的某种公共的语言,这意味着说话者的语言可以通过其他人的语言得到解释。莱波雷和路德维希举例说明存在满足戴维森的语义外部论的约定T,不需要有可解释的真理理论,但却需要一个附加的限制条件。彻底解释和三角测量是相互独立的,二者对意义的解释至关重要。研究戴维森的解释理论以及思考问题的方法,对于理解其意义理论及了解英美分析哲学都具有重要的启示作用。 Donald Davidson applied the theory of truth in the theory of meaning,and believed that meaning is publicly accessible.Radial interpretation theory focuses on the evidence it relies on,and on the formal and empirical constraints that are needed by the interpretive theory constructed on the basis of such evidence.Thought and language are interdependent,and the thought of the subject depends on some kind of public language that he possesses,which means that the language of a speaker can be interpreted by the language of others.Lepore and Ludwig had illustrated the existence of a Convention T that satisfied Davidson's semantic externalism,and had proved that there was no need for an interpretive theory of truth,but there was need for an additional constraint.The idea of radical interpretation and that of triangulation have been developed by Davidson quite in isolation from each other,but both are essential to his account of meaning.Studying Davidson's theory of interpretation and thinking methods has important implications for understanding his theory of meaning,as well as British and American analytical philosophy.
作者 董英东 Dong Yingdong
出处 《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期61-71,共11页 Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“动态信息的信念修正逻辑研究”(18FZX066)的阶段性成果。
关键词 彻底解释 证据 整体限制 因果限制 radical interpretation evidence holistic constraints causal constraints
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部