摘要
在我国刑法的每一个具体罪名之下实质上均存在着一个“犯罪构成群”,这一“犯罪构成群”可内分为两类犯罪构成:一是典型犯罪构成,二是非典型犯罪构成。我国目前的刑法立法和司法并没有将每一个具体罪名下的拟制犯、扩张解释犯、预备犯、未遂犯和中止犯当作几个独立罪种看待,而是将这几种行为统一归到典型犯罪构成的同一罪种之中,并以典型犯罪的同一罪名定罪处罚,这一做法违背了概念的原理。在每一个具体罪名的“犯罪构成群”里,典型犯罪构成、拟制的犯罪构成、扩张解释的犯罪构成和未完成形态的犯罪构成各自所体现的本质属性是不同的,它们应成立各自独立的犯罪构成,其行为种类各自应作为独立的罪种予以规定。
According to our criminal code currently in effect,there is a“group of constitution of crime”in every kind of name of crime in essence.This“group of constitution of crime”can be divided into two sorts:typical constitution of crime and atypical constitution of crime.At present,according to the legislation of criminal law and the judicature of criminal law,the attempted crime,the inchoate crime,the suspension crime,the crime of legal fiction and the crime of expansion explanation within the same crime name are not looked as several separate kinds of crime.They are looked as the same kind of crime together with the typical crime,and they are all convicted and punished using the same crime name of the typical crime.This practice violates the theory of concept.The criminal constitution re flects the essential attributes of a kind of crime,but the essential attributes between the typical constitution of crime and every atypical constitution of crime are different.Every atypical constitution of crime should be a separate constitution of crime,and every action of them should be a kind of independent crime.
作者
欧锦雄
OU Jin-xiong(Guangxi Police College,Nanning 530023,China)
出处
《北京警察学院学报》
2020年第2期1-10,共10页
Journal of Beijing Police College
关键词
同一罪名
犯罪构成群
典型犯罪构成
非典型犯罪构成
概念原理
same crime name
the group of constitution of crime
typical constitution of crime
atypical constitution of crime
the principle of concept
