摘要
随着认罪认罚从宽制度的推进,认罪认罚从宽案件被告人上诉的问题逐渐受到关注。当前我国学术界提出的一系列应对认罪认罚从宽案件被告人上诉问题的举措,大都是对被告人上诉权进行限制,这侵犯了被告人依法享有的诉讼权利,也与现行法律的规定以及我国的司法传统不符,不具有正当性和合法性,不能从根本上解决这一问题。上诉权是被告人享有的重要的诉讼权利,我国认罪认罚从宽制度的制度特征及运行环境决定了我国认罪认罚从宽案件被告人上诉权不应受到任何限制。新修改的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》(以下简称《刑事诉讼法》)也并没有对认罪认罚从宽案件被告人的上诉权作出限制。应对认罪认罚从宽案件被告人上诉的问题,转换思路,即不再局限于限制上诉权,而是通过加强上诉的事前预防和改变上诉后的处理方式规范上诉权,减少不必要的上诉。
With the development of the system of leniency in confession and punishment,the appeal of the accused in the case of leniency has attracted more and more attention.Currently,the measures put forward by Chinese academic circles to deal with such appeal mostly tend to limit the accused’s right of appeal,which violates both the litigation rights of the accused and China’s current legal provisions and judicial tradition.Therefore these measures are not justified and legitimate,and can not thoroughly solve the problem.The right of appeal is an important litigation right of the accused,and the characteristics and operating environment of the lenient system determine that the accused’s right of appeal should not be restricted.And the newly revised criminal procedure law does not limit it.In order to solve this problem,we should change our way of thinking,that is,instead of limiting the accused’s right of appeal,we should regulate and reduce the unnecessary appeals by strengthening the prevention of appeal and changing the way of handling the appeal.
作者
薛峰
XUE Feng(College of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)
出处
《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2020年第2期26-32,94,共8页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
认罪认罚从宽
被告人
上诉权
损失时间指令
leniency in confession and punishment
the accused
right of appeal
lost time instruction
