摘要
现代科学革命引发了科学认识论对科学绝对客观性的质疑。假设性科学实在不能从根本上支持实用主义、符合论与融贯论的三种真理观。经验主义三种方法论蕴含的相对主义倾向使逻辑主义科学哲学对科学的合理性重构陷入困境,从而表明自然界无法对人类获取的科学知识之真伪做出单边裁决。由于范式转换缺乏相应的标准与方法,最终只能诉诸科学共同体的集体意志做出民主抉择。科学知识社会学研究对科学的实践过程再现表明,科学知识的建构过程实际上也是科学实践主体与其他相关主体之间磋商求同的民主过程。
The modern scientific revolution has raised the challenge of scientific epistemology to the absolute objectivity of science.Hypothetical scientific entity cannot ultimately support the three views of truth of pragmatism,correspondence theory and coherentism.The relativism tendency contained in the three methodology of empiricism makes the reconstruction of scientific rationality by logicist philosophy of science into a dilemma,which indicates that nature cannot make a unilateral judgment on the authenticity of scientific knowledge acquired by human beings.Due to the lack of corresponding standards and methods for paradigm shift,we can only resort to the collective will of the scientific community to make democratic choices.SSK has manifested that the process of scientific knowledge construction shows that the process of the construction of scientific knowledge is actually the democratic process of consultation between the subject of scientific practice and other relevant subjects.
作者
尚智丛
章雁超
SHANG Zhi-cong;ZHANG Yan-chao(School of Humanities,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期104-109,共6页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目“科学知识的民主问题研究”(15AZX007)。
关键词
科学民主化
客观性
相对主义
哲学基础
democratization of science
objectivity
relativism
philosophical foundation
