摘要
目的研究分析在临床免疫检验中应用临床免疫检验质量控制的实际价值。方法该院接受免疫检验的带状疱疹患者132例展开研究,时间跨度为2018年7月—2019年4月,按照实施临床免疫检测质量控制措施前后来分组,未实施临床免疫检测质量控制措施的66例设为对照组,实施临床免疫检测质量控制措施的66例设为观察组,对比分析两组患者临床免疫指标检出率以及免疫功能(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+)、免疫球蛋白水平(IgA、IgM、IgG)水平。结果①观察组免疫球蛋白96.9%、肾功能95.4%、肝功能90.9%、血凝血细胞98.4%,对照组分别为84.8%,84.8%,77.2%,83.3%,观察组临床免疫检验各指标检出率显著较对照组高(χ^2=5.867、4.181、4.587、9.167,P<0.05)。②观察组免疫功能指标、免疫球蛋白水平较高(t=6.382、4.846、3.688、6.538、8.599、4.576、8.298,P<0.05)。结论在临床免疫检验中使用免疫检验分析质量控制效果显著,值得临床借鉴推广。
Objective To analyze the practical value of applying clinical immunoassay quality control in clinical immunoassay.Methods A total of 132 patients with shingles underwent immunological tests in the hospital were studied.The time span was from July 2018 to April 2019.They were divided into groups before and after the implementation of clinical immunoassay quality control measures.66 cases were set as the control group,and 66 cases were implemented as the observation group for the implementation of the quality control measures of clinical immunoassay.The detection rates of the clinical immune indicators and immune function(CD3+,CD4+,CD8+,CD4+/CD8+),and immune Protein levels(IgA,IgM,IgG)levels.Results 1.The observation group had 96.9%immunoglobulin,95.4%renal function,90.9%liver function,and 98.4%blood coagulation cells.The control group had 84.8%,84.8%,77.2%,and 83.3%,respectively.The output rate was significantly higher than the control group(χ^2=5.867,4.181,4.587,9.167,P<0.05).2.The immune function index and immunoglobulin levels in the observation group were higher(t=6.382,4.846,3.688,6.538,8.599,4.576,8.298,P<0.05).Conclusion The use of immunoassay in clinical immunoassay to analyze the quality control effect is significant,and it is worthy of clinical reference.
作者
张士跃
ZHANG Shi-yue(Department of Laboratory Medicine,Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital,Tongzhou District,Beijing,101100 China)
出处
《系统医学》
2020年第7期37-39,共3页
Systems Medicine
关键词
临床免疫检验
带状疱疹
质量控制
检验结果
可靠性
检出率
对比分析
Clinical immunoassay
Shingles
Quality control
Test results
Reliability
Detection rate
Comparative analysis
