期刊文献+

衰弱老年人运动锻炼最佳证据汇总 被引量:29

Best evidence summary for physical exercise in frail elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]汇总衰弱老年人运动锻炼的最佳证据。[方法]计算机检索中英文数据库获取衰弱老年人运动锻炼的所有证据,包括指南、证据总结、系统评价及专家共识等。对证据质量进行评价并对证据进行汇总。[结果]共纳入16篇文献,其中指南3篇、证据总结2篇、专家共识2篇及系统综述9篇。从衰弱老年人运动模式、运动类型、运动强度、运动频率与时间、运动原则、运动注意事项共总结6个方面的最佳证据。[结论]对衰弱老年人目前运动锻炼的最佳证据进行总结,有利于为制定衰弱运动干预方案提供循证依据。 Objective:To summarize best evidences of physical exercise in frail elderly.Methods:Chinese database and English database were electronically searched to collect literatures including guidelines,evidence summary,systematic review and expert consensus.Quality of evidences was evaluated and evidences were summarized.Results:A total of 16 articles were included,including 3 guidelines,2 evidence summaries,2 expert consensus and 9 systematic reviews.The best evidences in 6 aspects included exercise mode,exercise type,exercise intensity,exercise frequency and time,exercise principle and exercise precautions for frail elderly were summarized.Conclusions:It is conducive to provide evidence-based basis for formulating debilitating exercise intervention programs to summarize best evidence for physical exercise in frail elderly at present.
作者 李秋萍 韩斌如 陈曦 LI Qiuping;HAN Binru;CHEN Xi(Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University,Beijing 100053 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2020年第10期1681-1687,共7页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 北京市医院管理局2017年度临床医学发展专项项目,编号:ZYLX201706。
关键词 衰弱 老年人 运动干预 循证护理 运动锻炼 证据评价 frailty elderly exercise intervention evidence-based nursing physical exercise evidence evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献66

  • 1奚兴,郭桂芳,孙静.衰弱的内涵及其概念框架[J].实用老年医学,2013,27(8):687-690. 被引量:37
  • 2励建安.运动疗法的历史与未来[J].中国康复医学杂志,2003,18(2):68-68. 被引量:41
  • 3刘建平,夏芸.中文期刊发表的中医药系统综述或Meta-分析文章的质量评价[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2007,27(4):306-311. 被引量:59
  • 4Porta M. Chief editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. Fifth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008: 217. 被引量:1
  • 5刘建平, 主编. 循证中医药研究方法. 第1版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009: 298-299. 被引量:1
  • 6Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, et al . Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr , 2002, 2(2): 1-3. 被引量:1
  • 7Jadad A, Moher M, Browman G, et al . Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ , 2000, 321(7256): 537-540. 被引量:1
  • 8Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a comparison of Cochrane paper-based journals. JAMA , 1998, 280(3): 278-280. 被引量:1
  • 9Shea B, Dubé C, Moher D. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other tools. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context. Edited by: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: BMJ books, 2001: 122-139. 被引量:1
  • 10Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. BMJ , 1994, 309(6955): 648-651. 被引量:1

共引文献2361

同被引文献252

引证文献29

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部