期刊文献+

高校智慧校园评价指标体系研究 被引量:23

Research on the Evaluation Index System of University Smart Campus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前,高校普遍推进智慧校园建设,但各校建设水平参差不齐,且缺乏科学有效的评价标准。为此,在依据已有政策文件、相关文献、建设案例梳理智慧校园评价关键指标的基础上,文章初步构建了包括6个一级指标、23个二级指标和56个三级指标的高校智慧校园评价指标体系。之后,文章运用德尔菲法,经过两轮专家意见咨询,形成了包含6个一级指标、21个二级指标和54个三级指标的高校智慧校园评价指标体系(修订版),并利用专家排序法确定了各级评价指标的权重系数。高校智慧校园评价指标体系的构建及其权重系数的确定,可以指导智慧校园的建设者明确建设目标、内容和功能等,并"以评促建"提高智慧校园的建设质量。 At present,universities generally promote the construction of smart campus,but the construction levels of various universities are uneven and lack of scientific and effective evaluation standard.Therefore,on the basis of sorting out the key indicators of smart campus evaluation according to existing policy documents,relevant literature and construction cases,this paper preliminarily constructed an evaluation index system of university smart campus including 6 first-level indicators,23 second-level indicators,and 56 third-level indicators.After that,this paper used Delphi method and formed an evaluation index system of university smart campus(revised edition)including 6 first-level indicators,21 second-level indicators,and 55 third-level indicators after two rounds of expert opinion consultations.Meanwhile,the weight coefficients of evaluation indicators at all levels were determined by expert arrange method.The construction of evaluation index system of university smart campus and the determination of weight coefficients could guide the smart campus builders to clarify the construction goals,contents and functions,and improve the construction quality of smart campus through"promoting construction by evaluation".
作者 李璐 王运武 LI Lu;WANG Yun-wu(School of Wisdom Education,Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou,Jiangsu,China 221116)
出处 《现代教育技术》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期87-93,共7页 Modern Educational Technology
基金 2017江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“高校智慧校园建设与发展”(项目编号:KYCX17_1675) 2019年中央电化教育馆—英特尔“智能互联教育项目”《智能技术支持的教师个性化工作环境研究》(项目编号:192103)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 智慧校园 绩效导向 评价指标 权重系数 smart campus performance orientation evaluation index weight coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献24

  • 1中国信息化趋势报告(四十七) 2006-2020年国家信息化发展战略[J].中国信息界,2006(9):8-17. 被引量:5
  • 2张民选,朱兴德,吕杰昕,闫温乐.公平而卓越:世界教育发展的新追求[Z].中国教育学会比较教育分会第14届年会上海师范大学国际与比较教育研究中心参会论文,2008.1-9. 被引量:2
  • 3Looking back on 21 years of ICSEI Conferences. http: //www.icsei.net. 被引量:1
  • 4Edmonds, R. R. Effective Schools for the Urban Poor. Educational Leadership, 1979,37( 1 ) : 15-27. 被引量:1
  • 5Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., and Ecob, R. School Matters: the Junior Years. Wells: Open Books. 1958. 17-25. 被引量:1
  • 6Creemers, B. P. M. School Effectiveness, Effective Instruction and School Improvement in the Netherlands, in D. Reynolds & P. Cuttance (Eds.). School Effectiveness: Research, Policy and Practice. London: Cassell. 1992.48-70. 被引量:1
  • 7Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C. and Schaffer, G. (Eds.). World Class Schools-International Perspectives on School Effectiveness. London: Routledge Falmer, 2002.276-293. 被引量:1
  • 8Carroll, J. A Model of School Learning. In: L. W. Anderson (Ed.). Perspectives on School Learning. Selected Writings of John B. Carroll. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Inc, 1963.19-31. 被引量:1
  • 9Scheerens, J. School Effectiveness and Development of Process Indicators of School Functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1990, ( 1 ) : 61-80. 被引量:1
  • 10Stringfield, S.C. & R.E. Slavin. A Hierarchical Longitudinal Model for Elementary School Effects. In B.P.M. Creemers & G.J. Reezigt (Eds), Evaluation of Effectiveness, Groningen: ICO, 1992.35-69. 被引量:1

共引文献62

同被引文献229

引证文献23

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部