摘要
依据《环境保护法》明确规定的污染者负担原则,企业在生产经营过程中造成的生态环境损害由企业承担生态环境修复责任。由于生态环境损害涉及众多不特定人的环境权益,有学者主张企业破产清算阶段生态环境损害之债的优先受偿以解决“企业排污,百姓遭殃,政府买单”的问题,改善生态环境。但该主张与别除权相冲突,未谨慎考虑到部门法之间的协调性,容易引发道德风险。并且,生态环境修复费用巨大若使其优先受偿,对在后债权人不公平。为解决生态环境修复资金的来源,我国应建立破产企业生态环境保护基金制度,替代存有争议较大的生态环境损害之债的优先受偿,切实助力生态文明建设。
AAccording to the polluter’s burden principle clearly stipulated in the environmental protection law,the enterprise shall bear the responsibility of ecological environment restoration for the ecological environment damage caused in the process of production and operation.Because the damage to the ecological environment involves the environmental rights and interests of many unspecified people,some scholars claim that the debt of the damage to the ecological environment at the stage of enterprise bankruptcy and liquidation should be paid first to solve the problem of"enterprise pollution,people suffering,government paying"and improve the ecological environment.However,this proposition conflicts with the exclusion right,without careful consideration of the coordination between departmental laws,which can easily lead to moral hazard.Moreover,if the cost of ecological environment restoration is huge,it will be unfair to the later creditors.In order to solve the source of funds for ecological environment restoration,China should establish an ecological environment protection fund system for bankrupt enterprises to replace the priority payment of the debt of ecological environment damage which is controversial,and effectively help the construction of ecological civilization.
作者
李敏
Li Min(Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China)
出处
《柳州职业技术学院学报》
2020年第2期31-34,共4页
Journal of Liuzhou Vocational & Technical College
关键词
企业破产
清算阶段
生态环境损害之债
优先受偿
生态环境保护基金
enterprise bankruptcy
liquidation stage
debts of ecological environment damage
priority compensation
ecological environment protection fund
