期刊文献+

带线锚钉与钢板内固定治疗肱骨大结节骨折的优劣分析 被引量:14

Advantages and disadvantages of internal fixation with suture anchors and locking plate in the treatment of the greater tuberosity fracture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:手术治疗肱骨大结节骨折目前普及切开复位钢板螺钉固定,但存在着一些不足。目的:比较切开复位带线锚钉与切开复位钢板内固定治疗肱骨大结节骨折的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年12月苏州大学附属第一医院收治的肱骨大结节骨折33例患者的资料,根据内固定方式分为锚钉组(n=7)和钢板组(n=26),分别行切开复位带线锚钉和切开复位钢板螺钉内固定。统计比较2组患者手术时间、切口长度、术中失血量、术后骨折块再移位距离及术后1个月、3个月、末次随访肩关节功能Constant-Murle评分,并记录2组内固定的不良反应情况。结果与结论:①锚钉组手术时间(73.1±10.5)min短于钢板组(98.2±11.9)min,切口长度(7.3±1.1)cm小于钢板组(14.9±1.7)cm,术中失血量(45.0±7.1)m L小于钢板组(141.0±25.9)mL,差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05);②锚钉组术后骨折块再移位距离(3.0±1.8)mm大于钢板组(1.1±2.3)mm,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05);③术后1,3个月及末次随访时,2组之间Constant-Murle评分比较,差异均无显著性意义(P>0.05);④提示与切开复位钢板内固定相比,切开复位带线锚钉内固定治疗肱骨大结节骨折具有手术时间短、创伤小的优势。 BACKGROUND:Open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate is wildly used in treatment of the greater tuberosity fracture,but certain disadvantages still existed.OBJECTIVE:To compare the effects of open reduction and internal fixation with suture anchors and locking plate in the treatment of the greater tuberosity fracture.METHODS:A retrospective review of 33 patients with greater tuberosity fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation between January 2016 and December 2018 was conducted.According to internal fixation method,the patients were divided into anchor group(n=7)and plate group(n=26),which received open reduction+suture anchor fixation and open reduction+locking plate fixation.Operation time,incision length,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative displacement of fracture mass,and Constant-Murley score 1 and 3 months after surgery and in final follow-up were compared between the two groups.Adverse reactions were recorded in the two groups.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)Operation time was shorter in the anchor group(73.1±10.5 minutes)than in the plate group(98.2±11.9 minutes).Incision length was shorter in the anchor group(7.3±1.1 cm)than in the plate group(14.9±1.7 cm).Intraoperative blood loss was less in the anchor group(45.0±7.1 mL)than in the plate group(141.0±25.9 mL)(P<0.05).(2)Postoperative displacement of fracture mass was larger in the anchor group(3.0±1.8 mm)than in the plate group(1.1±2.3 mm)(P<0.05).(3)There was no significant difference in Constant-Murley score between the two groups 1 and 3 months after surgery and in final follow-up(P>0.05).(4)All results suggest that compared with locking plate fixation,suture anchor fixation is easier to be operated with small trauma in the treatment of the greater tuberosity fracture.
作者 王强 顾勇 陈亮 Wang Qiang;Gu Yong;Chen Liang(Suzhou Dushuhu Public Hospital,Suzhou 215000,Jiangsu Province,China;The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou 215000,Jiangsu Province,China)
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第30期4813-4817,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 苏州市临床重点病种诊疗技术专项(LCZX201701),项目负责人:陈亮。
关键词 骨折 内固定 钢板 带线锚钉 肱骨 移位 随访 bone fracture internal fixation steel plate suture anchor humerus displacement follow up
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献54

  • 1黄强,王满宜,荣国威.复杂肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(3):159-164. 被引量:198
  • 2张德光,刘福全,刘爱华.肱骨近端骨折锁定加压接骨板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(11):836-838. 被引量:28
  • 3Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalitie.K J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17(1): 42-54. 被引量:1
  • 4Lee SH, Ehrgent-Molina P, Breart G, et al. Risk factors for fractures of the proximal humerus: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. J Bone Miner Res, 2002, 17(5):817-825. 被引量:1
  • 5Nguyen TV, Center JR, Sambrook PN, et al. Risk factors for pmximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in dderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Am J Epidemiol, 2001, 153(6) :587-595. 被引量:1
  • 6Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, et al. Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 442:87-92. 被引量:1
  • 7Zyto K Non-operative treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Injury, 1998, 29(5) :349-352. 被引量:1
  • 8Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devdc Z, et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury, 2011, 42(4):408-413. 被引量:1
  • 9Ring D. Current concepts in plate and screw fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures. Injury, 2007, 38(Suppl 3):S59-S68. 被引量:1
  • 10Siffri PC, Pdndl RD, Coley ER, et al. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaverie and synthetic humeri. J Orthop Trauma, 2006, 20(8):547-554. 被引量:1

共引文献83

同被引文献80

引证文献14

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部