摘要
目的建立并检验居民及医务人员医疗器械消费倾向量表。方法结合国内外文献研究及我国实际情况,制定医疗器械消费倾向量表;以辽宁省9个示范区1805名居民及各级医疗机构2800名医务人员为调查对象开展问卷调查。结果居民及医务人员医疗器械消费倾向量表Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.757和0.688。探索性因子分析结果表明居民及医务人员量表均得到2个公因子,溢价倾向维度与品牌倾向维度归于同一个因子,其余结果均符合原设计。结论本研究建立的居民及医务人员医疗器械消费倾向量表,经调整后分为品牌倾向与重购意向两个维度,量表合理性良好,具有良好的信度及效度水平。
Objective To test the reliability and validity of domestic medical device consumption propensity scale in resident and medical personnel.Methods The consumption tendency of domestic medical device scale was developed by studying a large number of literatures and combining with the actual situation in China.The development of the scale was based on extensive literature research,and combined with the actual situations in China.A total of 1,805 residents and 2,800 medical personnel from 9 demonstration zones in Liaoning province were surveyed.Results The Cronbach’sαof resident scale and medical personnel scale were 0.757 and 0.688.The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that both residents scale and medical personnel scale had two main factors.Dimensions of premium purchase and brand preference were attributed to the same main factor.The other results are in line with the original design.Conclusion The study establishes the domestic medical device consumption propensity scale of resident and medical personnel.the scale is divided into brand preference and repurchase intention dimensions after adjustment.The scale is reasonable and has good reliability and validity.
作者
李爽
李昱莹
耿译航
邓渊
潘国伟
刘莉
LI Shuang;LI Yuying;GENG Yihang;DENG Yuan;PAN Guowei;LIU Li(Institute of Chronic Disease,Liaoning Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Shenyang Liaoning 110005,China;Research Center for Universal Health,School of Public Health,China Medical University,Shenyang Liaoning 110122,China)
出处
《中国医疗设备》
2020年第5期21-24,共4页
China Medical Devices
基金
国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0114201)
辽宁省自然基金资助计划(2019-MS-184)。
关键词
医疗器械消费倾向
溢价倾向
品牌倾向
重购意向
信度检验
效度检验
consumption propensity of medical devices
premium tendency
brand preference
repurchase intention
reliability test
validity test
