期刊文献+

EGFR单抗联合FOLFOX方案治疗晚期转移性结直肠癌的有效性及安全性分析 被引量:1

FOLFOX Schema Combined with EGFR Monoclonal Antibody in the Treatment of Late Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma:An Analysis on Effectiveness and Safety
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)单抗联合FOLFOX方案治疗晚期转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的有效性及安全性,选择2015年9月至2018年9月我院收治的148例mCRC患者作为研究对象,随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各74例。对照组接受FOLFOX方案化疗,观察组在对照组治疗基础上联合应用EGFR单抗(尼妥珠单抗注射液)治疗。比较2组患者临床疗效及不良反应。结果显示,观察组疾病总缓解率(ORR)为31.08%(23/74),疾病控制率(DCR)为82.43%(61/74);对照组ORR为22.97%(17/74),DCR为59.46%(44/74)。观察组ORR和DCR均明显高于对照组,P<0.05。2组患者恶心呕吐、神经毒性、腹泻、肝肾功能损伤、白细胞减少、血小板减少等不良反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义,P>0.05。结果表明,FOLFOX方案治疗晚期转移性结直肠癌的同时,联合应用EGFR单抗治疗,可提高疗效,而且不增加不良反应,值得临床推广。 This study was to explore the effectiveness and safety of late metastatic colorectal carcinoma(mCRC)treated with FOLFOX schema plus EGFR monoclonal antibody,enrolled 148 mCRC patients treated in author’s hospital(2015-09-2018-09)and randomly divided them into observation group(74 cases,received FOLFOX schema plus EGFR monoclonal antibody)and control group(74 cases,alone FOLFOX schema);then compared patient’s effect and their untoward reaction between the two groups.As results,in ORR(short for overall remission rate)and in DCR(short for disease control rate)observation group was all significantly higher than control group[31.08%(23/74)vs 22.97%(17/45),82.43%(61/74)vs 59.46%(44/74),all,P<0.05];in the incidence of untoward reactions such as nausea&vomitting,neurotoxicity,diarrhea,liver and kidney function injuried,leukopenia,and thrombocytopenia,etc,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Results show that above combined therapy can enhance effect,and not increase untoward reaction incidence,it is worthy to be popularized clinically.
作者 张颢 ZHANG Hao(Pharmacy Division,the First Affiliated Hospital to Henan University,Kai feng,Henan 475000)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2020年第2期3-5,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
基金 开封市科技发展计划项目(1703014).
关键词 转移性结直肠癌 EGFR单抗 FOLFOX方案 疗效 不良反应 Metastatic colorectal carcinoma EGFR monoclonal antibody FOLFOX schema Effect Untoward reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz,Karoline Horisberger,Christoph Woernle,Frederik Wenz,Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher,Georg K?hler,Dietmar Dinter,Rainer Grobholz,Steffen Heeger,Stefan Post,Andreas Hochhaus,Frank Willeke.Phase I trial of cetuximab in combination with capecitabine, weekly irinotecan, and radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics . 2006 (5) 被引量:1
  • 2G. J. C. Harris F.R.C.S.,J. M. Church F.R.A.C.S.,A. J. Senagore M.D.,I. C. Lavery F.R.A.C.S.,T. L. Hull M.D.,S. A. Strong M.D.,V. W. Fazio F.R.A.C.S..Factors Affecting Local Recurrence of Colonic Adenocarcinoma[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2002 (8) 被引量:1
  • 3Zhou C, Wu Y, Chen G, et al. Efficacy and biomarker data from BEYOND : A randomized phase 3 study of first- line chemotherapy + bevacizumab in Chinese patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer [ J ]. Int J Radiat Onco1,2014,90 (5) : S17. 被引量:1
  • 4Tamiya M, Tamiya A, Nakao K, et al. Efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel with bevacizumab as salvage chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer after failure of platinum-doublet chemotherapy [ J] . Anticancer Res, 2012,32 (8) :3553 - 3557. 被引量:1
  • 5Niho S, Kunitoh H, Nokihara H, et al. Randomized phase I] study of first-line carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in Japanese patients with advanced non- squamous non-small-cell lung cancer [ J ]. Lung Cancer, 2012,76(3) :362 -367. 被引量:1
  • 6Lopez-Vivanco G, Carrera S, Sancho A, et al. Bevacizumab (B), cisplatin ( C ), and pemetrexed (P) plus maintenance B in chemonaive patients (pts) with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC) : A phase II study [ C ]//ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. Chicago: American Society of Clinical Oncology,2012,30( 15 suppl) : e18031. 被引量:1
  • 7Shimizu R, Fujimoto D, Kato R, et al. The safety and efficacy of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab for treating patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer with interstitial lung disease[ J ]. Cancer Chemoth Pharm, 2014,74 (6) : 1159 - 1166. 被引量:1
  • 8Tamiya M, Tamiya A, Yamadori T, et al. Phase2 study of bevacizumab with carboplatin-paclitaxel for non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion [ J ]. Med Oncol,2013,30(3) :1 -6. 被引量:1
  • 9Nguyen TTT, Tran TYH. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab in combination with PC regimen versus PC regimen in non-small cell lung cancer treatment [ J ]. Value in Health ,2014,17 (3) : A87 - A87. 被引量:1
  • 10Hirsh V, Berger A, Binder G, et al. Cost effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin ( nab-PC ) relative to bevacizumab plus solvent-based paclitaxel and carboplatin ( B + sb-PC) in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol, 2014,90 (5) : $61 - $62. 被引量:1

共引文献24

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部