摘要
目的:比较奥氮平口服冲击疗法与氟哌啶醇肌注治疗精神病激越状态的临床效果。方法:2018年6月-2019年6月收治精神病激越状态患者78例,随机分为两组,各39例。对照组使用氟哌啶醇肌注治疗;研究组使用奥氮平口服冲击治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果:两组临床疗效、阳性和阴性症状量表兴奋因子(PANSS-EC)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:奥氮平口服冲击疗法与氟哌啶醇肌注治疗精神病激越状态显著效果,但奥氮平口服冲击治疗后不良反应发生率较低,舒适性和安全性更高。
Objective:To analyze the clinical effect of olanzapine oral shock therapy and haloperidol intramuscular injection in the treatment of psychiatric agitation.Methods:From June 2018 to June 2019,78 patients with psychiatric agitation were enrolled,they were randomly divided into two groups with 39 cases in each group.The control group was treated with haloperidol intramuscular injection and the study group was treated with olanzapine oral shock therapy.The therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared.Results:Two groups of clinical efficacy,the positive and negative symptom scale excitatory factor(PANSS-EC)score were compared,the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05);The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Olanzapine oral shock therapy and haloperidol intramuscular injection are effective in the treatment of psychotic agitation,however,the incidence of adverse reactions after oral shock therapy of olanzapine is lower and the comfort and safety are higher.
作者
罗伯确
Luo Boque(The People's Hospital of Yao Autonomous County of Jianghua,Hunan Yongzhou 425500)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2020年第13期16-17,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
奥氮平口服冲击疗法
氟哌啶醇肌注治疗
精神病激越状态
Olanzapine oral shock therapy
Haloperidol intramuscular injection therapy
Psychotic agitation
