摘要
在学术史上,《史通》外篇获得的评价并不高,《四库全书总目》及晚近学者多认为,其内容有与内篇"重出"或"抵牾"之处。追溯《史通》的学术渊源,并从理论体系的角度审视《史通》内外篇,可以发现内篇效仿了《文心雕龙》骈体专题论文的批评文体及其理论系统,外篇则在文本考证方法和述学文体两方面继承了《论衡》,弥补了内篇所缺乏的专书的专题研究;内篇讨论"近代之史",而外篇着意于《尚书》与《春秋》经传,亦是刘知幾为《史通》所设置的"断限"。因而,《史通》外篇的成立,是由史学需要专书研究的性质与骈文在论述文本考证方面的不足,以及《史通》自身的学术渊源共同决定的,不能将其简单视作刘知幾著述的初稿或者读书札记。
The Waipian of SHITONG is rated low in academic history.The author of Catalogue of SIKUQUANSHU and following scholars consider that it repeats or contradicts the content of Neipian.Tracing back the academic origin of SHITONG,and reviewing it from the angle of theoretical system,we can find out that the articles of Neipian follow the genre and theoretical system of WENXINDIAOLONG,as well as the articles of Waipian inherit LUNHENG in terms of text research and the academic genre,which make up the special topics of books which articles of Neipian lacked.The articles of Neipian focus on the writing of"modern history",but the articles of Waipian prefer discussing SHANGSHU,CHUNQIU and ZUOZHUAN.Because of these,the independence of the articles of Waipian are determined by the need of special topics of history books and the deficiencies of parallel prose in expressing textual research,as well as the academic origin of SHITONG.They can’t be simply regarded as drafts or notes.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期11-22,共12页
Journal of Historiography
基金
山东大学基本科研业务费项目“中古子书的文体形式研究”(项目编号:2019GN036)阶段性成果。
