摘要
对比1931年山东省建设厅制定的曲阜孔庙修葺计划与1935年梁思成拟定的《曲阜孔庙之建筑及其修葺计划》在文物修复观念上的不同,前者沿用旧式,而后者强调"保存或恢复原状"并运用新技术。讨论两者在"原状"处理上的不同。将这种转变放置在城市建设变革的背景下进行解释。对比彼时几种历史建筑修葺方式,引发对何为"原状"的讨论。
This study compares the difference between restoration schemes made by the Construction Bureau of Shandong Province in 1931 and by Liang Sicheng in 1935 respectively.The former follows traditional approaches,while the latter uses new technologies to make the historic building"keep in or restore to an original state".It also discusses the different treatments of"original state"between the two,interprets the transformation within the changing context of urban construction,and compares them with other restoration methods at that time.It then leads to a debate about what is"original state".
出处
《新建筑》
2020年第1期123-127,共5页
New Architecture
关键词
曲阜孔庙
梁思成
真实性
历史建筑修复观念
遗产保护
Qufu Confucian Temple
Liang Sicheng
authenticity
concept of historical building restoration
heritage protection
