摘要
民法典侵权责任编(草案三次审议稿)第九百六十四条规定的监护人责任存在归责原则不明、被监护人是否承担责任不明确、缺乏侵权之因果关系、忽视监护人职责履行之条件等问题。其原因在于监护人责任承担的理论基础不明、过度保护受害人、未兼顾对被监护人的保护和教育等。监护人责任的应然内涵应是:无民事行为能力人、限制民事行为人不法侵害他人造成损害的,由与其共同生活的监护人承担侵权责任。限制民事行为能力人在辨识能力范围内与监护人承担连带责任。监护人能够证明自己尽了监护义务或者即使尽了监护义务仍无法阻止损害发生的,不承担责任。
Article Nine hundred and sixty-four of the draft of Tort Liability of Civil Code(revised three times)states that the principle of liability fixation of the Guardian is not clear,whether the ward bears the liability is not clear,the cause and effect relationship of tort is absent,and the condition of the Guardian's duty is neglected.The reason is that the theoretical basis of the Guardian's responsibility is unclear,the victim is over-protected,and the Guardian's protection and education are not taken into account.The connotation of Guardian's liability should be:if there is no civil capacity and the person who has restricted the Civil Act has illegally infringed on others and caused damage,the Guardian who lives with the person shall bear the tort liability.To limit the joint and several liability of a civil capacity with his guardian within the limits of his capacity for discernment.A Guardian shall not be liable if he can prove that he has performed his duty of guardianship or that even if he has performed his duty of guardianship,he can not prevent the damage from occurring.
作者
覃英
黄永光
TAN Ying;HUANG Yong-guang(Marxist College of Hechi College,Guangxi,Hechi 546300;People's Procuratorate of Yizhou district,Hechi,Guangxi,Hechi 546300)
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2020年第1期17-23,48,共8页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
基金
2012年度广西高等学校重点资助科研项目“侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究”(项目编号:201202ZD083)阶段性成果。
