期刊文献+

老年人多维度体质综合评估量表的实证研究 被引量:1

An Empirical Study on the Multidimensional Comprehensive Physical Assessment Scale for Elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的在南昌市区对自制的老年人多维度体质综合评估量表进行可行性、实用性检验。方法于2018年11月至2019年9月进行现况调查,分层随机抽取6个年龄段(分60~64、65~69、70~74、75~79、80~84、≥85岁,每组200人,男女各半)共1200人,利用老年人多维体质综合评估量表对南昌市青山湖、西湖、东湖等区60岁以上老年人体质进行测量;百分位数法(Px)将每个年龄段的老年人体质得分划分为五段式(<P5、P5~P24、P25~P75、P76~P95、>P95)。统计分析老年人体质不同年龄、不同性别总分及各维度得分水平,并采用生物统计学的Linear、Logarithmic、Inverse、Quadratic、Cubic、Compound、Power、S、Growth、Exponential、Logistic等11种模型对个体的体质综合评分与个体年龄进行曲线拟合。结果完成有效体质量表971人份,男女比0.974∶1,老年人体质总分为33.57~87.68分,形态体貌、机能、素质得分分别为3.56~11.76、8.53~29.35、21.19~47.72分;总分值和同一维度分值的不同年龄段间差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.001);Quadratic模型对个体的体质与年龄进行拟合绘图的效果最佳。结论老年人体质总分及各维度得分随年龄增大而升高,该量表适用社区老年人群体质测评,便于社区60岁以上个体的体质综合评估和随访监测。 Objective To test the feasibility and practicability of the self-made multidimensional physical fitness comprehensive assessment scale for elderly in Nanchang city.Methods Current situation survey was performed from November 2018 to September 2019,and six age groups were randomly selected by stratification(60-64,65-69,70-74,75-79,80-84 and≥85,200 subjects in each group,male-to-female ratio 1:1).The multidimensional physical fitness comprehensive assessment scale was used to measure the physical fitness of the elderly aged over 60 years in Qingshan Lake,West Lake,East Lake and other districts of Nanchang.The physical fitness scores of elderly in each age group were divided into five paragraphs using the percentile method(Px):<P5,P5-P24,P25-P75,P76-P95,and>P95.Statistical analysis was made on the total score of constitution of the elderly with different ages and genders,as well as on the scores of various dimensions.The curve fitting between the comprehensive score of constitution of individuals and their ages was conducted by using 11 biostatistical models,including Linear,Logarithmic,Inverse,Quadratic,Quadratic,Cubic,Compound,Power,S,Growth,Exponential and Logistic.Results A total of 971 participants completed the assessment scale with a male-to-female ratio of 0.974:1.The total score of physical fitness was 33.57-87.68 in the elderly.The scores of appearance,function and quality were 3.56-11.76,8.53-29.35 and 21.19-47.72,respectively.There were significant differences in the total score and the score of the same dimension among different age groups(P<0.001).Quadratic model had the best effect on fitting the individual constitution and age.ConclusionThe total score and the scores of all dimensions of physical fitness increase with age.This scale is applicable to the physical fitness assessment in elderly community population,and is convenient for the comprehensive assessment and follow-up monitoring of physical fitness in individuals over 60 years old in the community.
作者 龙静文 蔡天盼 黄河浪 吴磊 LONG Jing-wen;CAI Tian-pan;HUANG He-lang;WU Lei(Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Preventive Medicine,Nanchang 330006,China)
出处 《南昌大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2020年第1期69-74,93,共7页 Journal of Nanchang University:Medical Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(81560550,81360446) 南昌大学本科生创新专项基金(2018407)。
关键词 老年人 体质 综合评估 量表 实证研究 elderly physical fitness comprehensive assessment scale empirical research
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1中国学生体质与健康调研组.中国学生体质与健康研究[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1987.. 被引量:22
  • 2邢文华 于道中 季成叶.中国国民体质监测系统的研究[M].北京:北京体育大学出版社,2002.35-40. 被引量:1
  • 3叶广俊.现代儿童少年卫生学[M].北京:北京人民卫生出版社,1998.311-313. 被引量:9
  • 4于道中 邢文华 季成叶.’94中国职工体质调查研究报告[M].北京:人民体育出版社,1997.. 被引量:1
  • 5陈明达 于道中.中国学生体质综合评价方法及标准[M].北京:人民体育出版社,1989.. 被引量:1
  • 6中华医学会老年医学分会;中华老年医学杂志编辑部.中国健康老年人标准(2013)[J]{H}中华老年医学杂志. 被引量:1
  • 7Folstein MF,Folstein SE,McHugh PR. " Minimental state".A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician[J].{H}Journal of Psychiatric Research,1975.189-198. 被引量:1
  • 8D'Ath P,Katona P,Mullan E. Screening,detection and management of depression in elderly primary care attenders.Ⅰ:The acceptability and performance of the 15 item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15) and the development of short versions[J].{H}FAMILY PRACTICE,1994.260-266. 被引量:1
  • 9Mahoney FI,Barthel DW. Functional evaluation:the Barthel index[J].{H}Maryland State Medical Journal,1965.61-65. 被引量:1
  • 10曹茂林.层次分析法确定评价指标权重及Excel计算[J].江苏科技信息,2012(2):39-40. 被引量:230

共引文献115

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部