期刊文献+

基于PDS的铁路信号冗余结构危险失效概率计算方法 被引量:5

Computing Method of Dangerous Failure Probability of Redundancy Structures of Railway Signal Based on PDS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在铁路信号领域的安全评估中常采用IEC61508中的方法计算产品的每小时危险失效概率(Probability of a Dangerous Failure Per Hour,PFH),但该方法所面向的工业控制系统同铁路信号地面控制系统间存在差异性,且计算过程针对共因失效的分析较少。采用PDS(挪威语缩写,代表安全仪表系统的可靠性)方法定量计算铁路信号冗余结构的PFH,首先分析铁路信号系统典型的3种冗余结构,然后通过引入结构修正因子CMOON改进β参数模型,以区分共因失效对不同冗余结构PFH影响的不同,接着根据3种冗余结构的工作特点构建系统可靠性框图,并给出不同冗余结构通用的PFH计算公式,最后以实验数据进行仿真,结果显示,与采用IEC61508中的方法相比,本文的方法更加注重共因失效对PFH的影响程度,符合现场设备的实际使用情况。 The method of IEC61508 is often used to calculate the Probability Of Dangerous Failure Per Hour(PFH)of products in the safety assessment of railway signal system.However,the standard is more suitable for industrial control systems,and such systems are different from ground control system of railway signal.Furthermore,the analysis of common cause failure needs more research.In this paper,the PFH of redundant structures of railway signal is quantitatively calculated by means of PDS(a Norwegian acronym for reliability of safety instrumented systems)theory.Firstly,three typical redundancy structures of railway signal system are analyzed.Secondly,the parameter model is improved by introducing the structural correction factor to distinguish the influence of common cause failure on different redundant structures’PFH,then the reliability block diagrams of these three redundancy structures are built by analyzing their working characteristics.Meanwhile,the general PFH formulas for different redundant structures are given.Eventually the simulation results obtained from experimental data show that,compared with the method in IEC61508,the proposed method addresses more on the effect of common cause failure on PFH.
作者 张宏扬 段武 王龙生 梁志国 关恽珲 ZHANG Hongyang;DUAN Wu;WANG Longsheng;LIANG Zhiguo;GUAN Yunhun(Postgraduate Department,China Academy of Railway Sciences,Beijing 100081,China;Communication and Signaling Research Institute,China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《铁道标准设计》 北大核心 2020年第4期168-174,共7页 Railway Standard Design
基金 国家自然科学基金-高铁联合基金(U1734211) 中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划(2017X013-C) 中国铁道科学研究院通信信号研究所科技研究开发基金(1752TH0104)。
关键词 铁路信号 冗余结构 危险失效概率 PDS 共因失效 结构修正因子 参数 railway signal redundancy structures probability of dangerous failure PDS common cause failure correction factor of structure parameter
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献35

  • 1史学玲.功能安全标准的历史过程与发展趋势[J].仪器仪表标准化与计量,2006(2):6-8. 被引量:20
  • 2总装备部军标出版发行部.电子设备可靠性预计手册GJB/Z299B-98[s].总装备部,1999. 被引量:2
  • 3[1] Fleming K N. A reliability model for common cause failures in redundant safety systems[Z]. Sixth annual pittsburgh conference on modeling and simulation, Pittsburgh, 1975. 被引量:1
  • 4[2] Atwood C L. The binomial failure rate common cause model[J]. Technometrics, 1986, 28(2):139~148. 被引量:1
  • 5[3] Fleming K N, Mosleh A. Classification and analysis of reactor operating experience involving dependent events[R]. California: Pickard, Lowe and Garrick, Inc.,PLG-0400,1985. 被引量:1
  • 6[4] Fleming K N, Kalinowski A M. An extension of the beta factor method to systems with high levels of redundancy[R]. California: Pickard, Lowe and Garrick, Inc., PLG-0289,1983. 被引量:1
  • 7[5] Mosleh A, Fleming K N, Parry G W, et al. Procedures for treating common cause failures in safety and reliability study[R]. California: NUREG/CR,4780,1988. 被引量:1
  • 8[6] Elizabeth J K, Geralyn M H, Estimation techniques for common cause failure events[R]. California: NUREG/CR,5044,1988. 被引量:1
  • 9GB/Z768A一98故障树分析指南[S].国防科学技术工业委员会,1998. 被引量:1
  • 10IEC 61025 Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) [S]. International Elec- trotechnical Commission, 2006. 被引量:1

共引文献46

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部