期刊文献+

基于DRGs的肝病专科住院医疗服务能力分析 被引量:2

Analysis of Inpatient Medical Service Capacity of Hepatology Department Based on DRG Indicators
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析2018年肝病专科的住院医疗服务能力,为科室精细化管理、提高肝病诊疗能力和加强肝病专科的发展提供数据支持。方法以宁波市某三甲医院肝病专科6个临床科室为研究对象,根据医院2018年住院病案首页数据经分组器分组后的结果,计算各临床科室疾病诊断相关组(Diagnosis Related Groups,DRGs)组数、DRGs总权重数、病例组合指数(Case Mix Index,CMI)、每床位工作负荷、每医师工作负荷、时间消耗指数、费用消耗指数指标,分析各临床科室病种结构,比较各临床科室的病种顺位前10的DRG组的专科时间效率指数和费用效率指数。结果2018年肝病专科6个临床科室中E科DRGs组数最多,CMI值最大,每床位产出最高;F科治疗同类疾病所花费的时间和费用最低,DRGs总权重数和每医师产出最高。不同临床科室主要病种不同。病种顺位前10的各病种时间效率指数最低的科室依次为:D、E、F、C、F、C、E、A、A、E;各病种费用效率指数最低的科室依次为:D、F、F、A、F、C、E、C、A、A。结论DRGs可以对临床专科各临床科室的住院医疗服务能力进行对比分析。 Objective To study the inpatient medical service capacity of hepatology department,to provide data support for refine department management,improving the capacity of diagnosis and treatment for liver diseases,and facilitating the development of hepatology department.Methods The analysis was performed based on inpatient medical record homepages of six clinical hepatology departments in a tertiary hospital in Ningbo.The data on the medical record homepages of 2018 were grouped and then used to calculate the number of Diagnosis Related Groups(DRGs),the total weight of DRGs,the case mix index(CMI),the workload per bed,the workload per physician,time consumption index and cost consumption index of each department.The disease structure,time efficiency index and cost efficiency index of the top 10 DRGs in each department were compared.Results In 2018,department E had the most DRGs,the largest CMI and the highest output per bed among the 6 departments.The department F had the lowest time and cost consumption index and the highest total weight of DRGs and output per physician.The main diseases in different departments were different.As for top 10 DRGs diseases,the departments with the lowest time efficiency index were D,E,F,C,F,C,E,A,A and E,and the departments with the lowest cost efficiency index were D,F,F,A,F,C,E,C,A and A.Conclusion DRGs can be used for comparison analysis of inpatient medical service capacity of clinical departments.
作者 曾祥嫚 吴姗姗 杨毓芳 郑小庆 王明红 茹平 ZENG Xiang-man;WU Shan-shan;YANG Yu-fang;ZHENG Xiao-qing;WANG Ming-hong;RU Ping(Hwa Mei Hospital,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
出处 《医院管理论坛》 2020年第1期30-33,共4页 Hospital Management Forum
关键词 DRGS 肝病专科 住院 医疗服务能力 Diagnosis Related Groups Hepatology department Hospitalization Medical service capacity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献55

  • 1黄慧英.诊断相关分类法在北京地区医院管理中的可行性研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,1994,10(3):131-136. 被引量:99
  • 2阎玉霞,徐勇勇.病例组合分类结果的评价[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(2):163-164. 被引量:17
  • 3Fetter R, Freeman J, Averill A, et al. Case mix definition by di- agnosis related groups[J]. MedCare, 1980, 18(2): 1-53. 被引量:1
  • 4Francis HRF. Case mix use in 25 countries: a migration success but international comparisons failure[J]. International Journal of Medical Informaties, 200a, 7O." 215-219. 被引量:1
  • 5北京市政府.北京市2010-2011年深化医药卫生体制改革实施方案[EB/OL].[2010-06-04].[2011-09-14]http://zhengwu.Beijing.gov.cn/zwzt/ygIazj/t]]16697.htm. 被引量:1
  • 6Jian W, Huang Y, Hu M, et al. Performance evaluation of inpa- tient service in Beijing: a horizontal comparison with risk ad- justment based on Diagnosis Related Groups[EB/OL]. BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:72 [2009-04-01]. http:// www. biomedcentral, com/1472-6963/9/72/. 被引量:1
  • 7Kattcy E. Two decades of casm:ix-Department of Health and Age- ing [ EB/OL]. [2011-09-14]. http://www, healtK gov. au/inter- net/main/publishing, nsf/Content/.../Kathy?%Eagar, pps. 被引量:1
  • 8Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes [M]. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 9Grimaldi PL, Mieheletti JA. Diagnosis related groups: a racti-tioner's guide[M]. 2nd ed. Chicago:Pluribus Press, 1983. 被引量:1
  • 10Commonwealth of Australia. Australian refined Diagnosis Related Groups, Version 5.0, Definitions Manual[M]. 2002, Canberra. 被引量:1

共引文献304

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部