期刊文献+

我国反垄断法宽恕制度的发展与完善

The Development and Improvement of the Leniency policy in China’s Antimonopoly Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宽恕制度的“萝卜加大棒”式制度立法设计使得各国在垄断协议执法上取得了显著的实效,对报告者的宽大与严厉的处罚使得垄断协议内部瓦解成为可能,但自我国《反垄断法》引入宽恕制度以来,由于立法的缺憾:适用宽恕程序阶段不清晰,适用主体范围狭窄,责任机制不健全,豁免幅度立法过宽导致的执法机构裁量权扩张以及处罚标准不合理等,导致执法实践收效甚微。鉴于此,亟需从立法上重新正确审视宽恕制度的价值功能,完善宽恕制度立法。 The legislative design of“turnip plus stick”system of leniency policy has made significant effect on the enforcement of monopoly agreement in various countries.The leniency and severe penalty on the reporter make it possible for the internal collapse of monopoly agreement.However,the introduction of leniency policy in China’s anti-monopoly law is of little effect in practice due to the shortcomings of legislation,such as unclear stage of application of leniency procedure,narrow scope of application subjects,incompleteness of liability mechanism,and the discretion expansion of law enforcement authorities and the irrationality of penalty caused by over ranged exemption legislation.In view of this,it is urgent to re-examine the value of leniency policy and improve the legislation of leniency policy.
作者 罗宇蔚 LUO Yuwei(Law school,Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics,Urumqi 830012,China)
出处 《燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2020年第2期51-56,共6页 Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science
关键词 反垄断法 宽恕制度 立法完善 anti-monopoly law leniency policy legislative perfection
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献139

  • 1王秋良,刘金妫.反垄断法宽恕制度实施条件比较[J].东方法学,2010(4):100-107. 被引量:14
  • 2王先林.理想与现实中的中国反垄断法——写在《反垄断法》实施五年之际[J].交大法学,2013(2):16-30. 被引量:28
  • 3林秀弥,王先林,陈贺明.日本禁止垄断法的最新发展[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,15(4):21-28. 被引量:5
  • 4U.S Department of Justice,Antitrust division,Corporate Leniency Poli-cy,10 August 1993;U.S Department of Justice,Antitrust division,Leni-ency Policy for Individual,10 August 1994. 被引量:1
  • 5Scott D.Harmmond,Detec-ting and deterring cartel activity through an effective leniency policy,TheInternational Workshop on Cartels,Brighton,England,November 21,2000. 被引量:1
  • 6[日]日本律师联合会、消费者问题对策委员会编《美国招标制度报告书》,[日]共同通信社,2000年,第37页. 被引量:1
  • 7European Commission,Competition.Commission Proposes Changes to the Leniency Notice Frequently AskedQuestions.http.//europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/06/357&format=PDF&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.2006-09-29. 被引量:1
  • 8Gary R.Spratling,Deputy Assistant AttorneyGeneral of Antitrust Division of U.S.Department of Justice,The CorporateLeniency Policy.Answers to Recurring Questions,address before the ABAAntitrust Section 1998 Spring Meeting,Washington,DC,April 1998. 被引量:1
  • 9KyP.Ewing,Jr.,Competition Rules for the 21st Century.Principle from A-merica's Experience,Kluwer Law International,2006,p632-643. 被引量:1
  • 10[日]中藤力.《美国反托拉斯法宽大制度的现状与引入日本的检讨》[J].公正取引,2002,617. 被引量:1

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部