摘要
目前占主导地位的中国新闻史分期方式呈现出僵化态势,具体表现为倾向于追溯更古老的"源头"、追求有序、毫无断裂的历史脉络以及对填补"空白"赋值过高等。导致的后果是新闻史研究被简化为起源追溯;历史进程被画成一条直线;过于拔高"空白"迎合主流分期,忽视历史情境及其他结构性力量等。在政治原因以及新闻史教学、教材编纂、大学体制中的诸多因素以及史料建设、新闻志书编修等活动的共同作用下,分期方式在一定程度上被"制度化"。因此,原本可以"作为创新的语言"的分期方式被固化,从而导致目前中国新闻史研究很难找到"可以进步到新的评价方法的工具"。
At present,the dominant way of China’s journalism history periodization features rigidity,which is manifested in the tendency to trace back to the older“sources”,the pursuit of orderly and uninterrupted historical context and the overvaluation of the fillings in the“blank”.As a result,the study of journalism history is simplified to trace back to its origin;the course of history is visualized as a straight line;the historical blank is overrated to cater to the mainstream ways of periodization;and the historical context and other structural forces are ignored.With the common effect of various factors such as the political reasons,the teaching of journalism history,the compilation of textbooks,factors existing in the university system,the construction of historical materials and the compilation of journalism records,the periodization of the journalism has been“institutionalized”to some extent.Due to the periodization approach that could have functioned as“the language of innovation”has been solidified,it is difficult to find“a tool to drive a new evaluation method”in the current study of Chinese journalism history.
作者
赵战花
来向武
ZHAO Zhan-hua;LAI Xiang-wu(School of Journalism and Communication,Xi’an International Studies University;School of Journalism and Communication,Northwest University,Xi’an 710061,China)
出处
《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期64-71,共8页
Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区项目“中国新闻志书研究”(17XJC860004)。
关键词
中国新闻史
分期
历史时间
the history of Chinese journalism
periodization
historical time
