摘要
在互联网、大数据等技术驱动的数字经济时代,“数据”逐渐成为商业经济中的新“石油”,是未来商业竞争中的核心命脉和重要驱动力。数据的流动与竞争创造价值,与此同时也带来更多风险与争议。近年来,互联网市场围绕数据的竞争与争议不断涌现,关于数据交易、用户权益与商业模式的讨论从未停止,引发了各方对数据时代的数据规则的检视与反思。在这一系列纠纷中,历经一审、二审的“新浪诉脉脉”案被称为大数据引发不正当竞争的第一案,其判决书洋洋洒洒数十万字,主要聚焦于Open API的运行规则、爬虫技术、协同过滤算法等讨论,尤其在该案中创设的“三重授权”司法裁判规则,反映了司法界对互联网环境下的竞争秩序与用户权利之间的平衡和思考。
In the era of digital economy driven by Internet,big data and other technologies,"data"has gradually become the new"oil"in commercial economy,and is the core lifeblood and significant driving force of future commercial competition.The flow and competition of data creates value,but at the same time it brings more risks and controversies.In recent years,the competition and controversy around data in the Internet market keep emerging.The discussion on data transaction,usersz rights and business model has never stopped,which triggers the review and reflection of data rules in the data era.Among the series of disputes,the case of"Sina v.Maimai"has gone through the first instance,second instance and been known as the first case of unfair competition caused by big data.Hundreds of thousands of words,the verdicts mainly focus on the discussions among operation rules of Open API,crawler technology and collaboration filtering algorithm,especially the"triple authorization"judicial referee rules created in this case,reflecting the balance and thinking between the judicial order and the users'rights in the Internet environment.
出处
《上海市经济管理干部学院学报》
2020年第1期57-64,共8页
Journal of Shanghai Economic Management College
