期刊文献+

移动设备电子搜查的制度挑战与程序规制——以英美法为比较对象 被引量:8

System Challenges and Procedural Regulation of Portable Device Search: In Comparison to Anglo-Saxon Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 评估执法的正当需求和手机用户的合法权益成为移动互联网时代的程序规制命题。移动设备搜查对警察权力的重要性和公民权利保护的重要性日益凸显,应当将移动设备视为人们具有合理信赖的一个信息隐私空间。英国、美国的手机搜查规范上的域内不统一导致搜查实践的多样态、公民权利的保护缺陷。但其应对证据的移动电子化的基本思路——根据信息种类或其他变量进行立法,区别对待搜查条件——对中国相关搜查问题的解释和解决具有镜鉴意义。我国需要考虑确立获得搜查批准的原则,通过类型化规则给执法提供明确指导,并且明确搜查后的系列权利保障,进行电子搜查规则的适时调整与动态平衡。 The search of portable devices is increasingly important to police power and citizen rightsAssessing just needs of law administration and privacy interests of mobile phone users has become a procedural regulation issue in the age of mobile Internet. UK and USA face difficulties in the practice and norms of searching mobile phones —— in—unified norms leads to diverse practice and insufficient protection of citizen rights —— but their basic idea dealing with mobile electronic evidence—legislating different warranting conditions by information categories or other factors—is illuminating to explaining and solving relevant searching issues in China. In designing new rules we should consider that mobile devices has involved citizen rights in a substantively different way and balance the complexity of searching electronic materials. The systematic construction needs to establish the principle of getting a warrant, categorize practicing rules and clarify serial ex post protection of citizen rights, in order to timely adjust rules and strike a dynamic balance.
作者 郭旨龙 Guo Zhilong
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期101-113,共13页 Law Science Magazine
基金 国家社科基金项目“数据开放的刑法边界研究”(项目编号:17CFX022)的阶段性成果。
关键词 电子设备 手机搜查 数据隐私 打击犯罪 正当程序 electronic device mobile phone search data privacy cracking crimes due process
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献65

共引文献163

同被引文献109

引证文献8

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部