摘要
房屋供给和管理的市场化使得城市居住空间的治理主体和治理格局变得多元而复杂,国家、市场和社会均有着各自不同的行动逻辑和行动目标。在既有的物业服务合同之外,借用额外的商业机构来解决社区中的物权问题成为业主维护自身房权权益的重要手段,案例研究显示,基于特定物权问题的倒逼逻辑和基于工具主义的实用逻辑是商业机构介入城市社区的基本缘由。作为一种市场化的治理工具,商业机构在预防物业纠纷、制衡物业公司、保护业主权益的过程中,既有自身内在的局限,也会受到城市基层社会国家权力的干预与影响。这证明了在城市社区当中,社会力量自主发起的、市场化的治理路径与国家威权主义的治理结构之间存在着一定的张力。业主自发探索的市场化治理工具在何种程度上能够实现其预期的目标,不仅取决于这种工具自身,也同样取决于围绕城市居住空间治理所进行的制度安排。
Since the end of the 1990 s,the privatization of housing provision and maintenance in China has complicated the governance of the residential space and resulted in countless social conflicts regarding property management.Homeowners,who are always suffering agreat loss in their housing rights,are experimenting with every possible means to safeguard their property.It is against this background that commercial organizations,which works as business actors that participate in residential neighborhood governance by proving profit-making service such as consultation,are being employed by homeowners to empower themselves.Drawing on an empirical case study in Beijing and Shanghai,this research finds that the infringement of housing rights and the function of commercial organizations are the leading factors that account for homeowners’ acceptance of business actor.Serving as a property governance instrument,commercial organization is effective in preventing and defusing housing-related disputes,but this instrumental governance approach,at the same time,is suffering from its internal drawbacks and the inference from the state.The findings in this research prove that conflicts exist between the current governance structure of the residential space and the innovative market-oriented property governance approach in urban China.
作者
胡洁人
郑扬
李咏梅
Hu Jieren;Zheng Yang;Li Yongmei
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第3期3-11,共9页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
上海市哲社规划一般项目“新时代上海市群团组织参与社会矛盾纠纷化解机制研究”(项目编号:2018BSH001)
中央高校基本科研业务项目“新时代推动妇联有效参与信访矛盾纠纷化解机制研究”(项目编号:22120190046)的阶段性成果。
关键词
商业机构
城市居住空间
物权治理
Commercial Organizations
Urban Residential Space
Property Governance
