期刊文献+

技术人工物何以是艺术品? 被引量:4

How Could Technological Artifacts Be Works of Art?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 意向、要素、结构、功能与环境构成了通常意义上的技术人工物系统模型。技术人工物要成为艺术品,技术人工物系统模型还需要增加边界因素。边界与上述五个因素相互作用,共同构成技术人工物作为艺术品的本体论模型。技术人工物的形式不能仅指外在边界或结构,而是其外在边界、结构、功能以及要素的整体显现。意向含有审美意识并指向了其他因素,使技术人工物具有“美”的形式成为可能。功能与美学的统一使技术人工物具有象征的美学意义。随着现代技术的日益精进,技术与艺术之间由分离重归融合;作为二者深度融合的产物,技术人工物成为艺术品,已是题中应有之义。 Intentions,elements,structures,functions and environment constitute the systematic model of technological artifacts in the common sense.In order to make technological artifacts become works of art,the boundary factor should be taken into account,which interacts with the above five factors.Accordingly,the boundary factor and the other five factors constitute the ontological model of technological artifacts as works of art.The forms of technological artifact are not just boundaries or structures,but the overall manifestation of boundaries,structures,functions and elements.Equipped with aesthetic consciousness and combined with other factors,intentions make it possible for technological artifacts to be“aesthetic”.The unification of functions and aesthetics enables technological artifacts to be of symbolic aesthetic significance.With the improvement of modern technologies,technology and art undergo the transformation from separation to integration.As a product of deep integration,technological artifacts become art,which echoes well the meaning of the title.
作者 吴国林 刘小青 WU Guo-lin;LIU Xiao-qing(School of Marxism,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,China)
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期1-8,119,共9页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(19ZDA038)
关键词 技术人工物 艺术品 审美意识 形式 象征 功能 technological artifact works of art aesthetic consciousness form symbol function
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1拉普.《技术哲学导论》[M].辽宁科学技术出版社,1986年版.第19页. 被引量:7
  • 2钱学森,1983年:《工程控制论》(修订版),科学出版社. 被引量:1
  • 3Baker, L.R. , 2004, "The ontology of artifacts", in Philosophical Explorations 7 (2). 被引量:1
  • 4Bunge, M. , 1998, Philosophy of Science, Vol. II, Berlin, Heileberh, New York: Springer. 被引量:1
  • 5Houkes, W. & Meijers, A. , 2006, "The ontology of artefacts: the hard problem", in Studies in History Philosophy of Science 37 ( 1 ). 被引量:1
  • 6Kroes, P., 1998, " Technological explanations: the relation between structure and function of technological objects", in Society for Philosophy and Technology 3 (3). 被引量:1
  • 7Kroes, P.,2006, "Coherence of structural and functional descriptions of technical artifacts", in Studies in History Philosophy of Science PartA 37 ( 1 ). 被引量:1
  • 8Meijers, A. , 2000, "The relational ontology of technical artifacts", in Kroes P. & Meijers, A. Editors, The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, Amsterdam : JPI Press, Elservier Science Ltd. 被引量:1
  • 9Miller, C. , 2007, "The structure of instrumental practical reasoning", in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1). 被引量:1
  • 10Mitcham, C. , 2002, "Do artifacts have dual natures?" in Techn6 (2). 被引量:1

共引文献35

同被引文献16

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部