摘要
20世纪三四十年代,吕思勉先是批评傅斯年在书写东北族群历史时“隐讳而不能尽言”,后又批评顾颉刚关于“民族”“汉族”等概念不宜使用的观点。吕思勉对傅斯年与顾颉刚的批评,反映出影响民国史家书写“民族问题”的三个因素:族群认识差异、概念含义混乱和现实需求。考察中国现代学术发展历程可知,这三个因素对“民族问题”研究与书写的影响,一直贯穿到当下。在中国现代历史书写这个研究主题上,从宏观和微观层面对影响历史书写的因素进行分析,还有很大的掘进空间。
In the 1930s and 1940s,Lv Simian criticized Fu Sinian for "obscure and not saying everything"when writing the history of the Northeastern ethnic groups.Then,he criticized Gu Jiegang's views that the "nation","Han"and other concepts should not be used.Lv Simian's criticism reflects three factors that affect the writing of "ethnic issues"of the historians during the period of the Republic of China:differences in ethnic consciousness,confusion of concept and realistic demand.Through researching the modern Chinese academic history,we can learn that the impact of the three factors on the research and writing of "ethnic issues"have remained until now.And a detailed research on factors from the macro and micro levels is needed.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第4期31-40,共10页
Journal of Historiography
关键词
族群意识
历史书写
民族问题
吕思勉
民国史学
ethnic consciousness
historical writing
ethnic issues
Lv Simian
historiography during the period of the Republic of China
