摘要
由于网络经济的竞争较之传统经济的竞争有明显不同的价值判断,法院在互联网不正当竞争案件审判需要关注的多个要点上均存在较大争议。本文通过对网络经济竞争行为特征的分析,结合审判实践探索,提出以竞争效能为基点判断被诉竞争行为的可责性、以故意作为判断竞争者主观过错的主要标准、以鼓励包容为出发点判断权利主张者权益的合法性、以因果关系为主要判断替代竞争关系判断、引进产业生态链损害作为确定损害结果及损害赔偿的考量因素等有别于传统不正当竞争案件审判的新观点,以期为类案审判提供参考、为互联网竞争规制提供司法指引。
As the competition in the Internet economy has significantly different value judgments to that of the traditional economy,the courts have major controversies on a number of points that need attention in the trial of Internet unfair competition cases.Based on the analysis of the characteristics of the competitive behavior of the Internet economy,and combined with trial practice,this paper proposes new perspectives of adopting the effectiveness of the competition to judge the accountability of the accused competitive behavior,of using deliberately as the main criterion for competitor'subjective fault judgment,of setting embrace tolerance for judging the legality of the rights of the claimants,of taking causality as the main instead of traditional competition relationship,and of considering the industrial ecological chain as a factor for determining the outcome of damage and damages etc.The above new perspectives are different from the traditional unfair competition cases trials,which may provide reference for trials in similar cases and judicial guidance for Internet competition regulations.
出处
《中国应用法学》
2020年第1期84-94,共11页
China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
关键词
网络经济
不正当竞争
裁判要点
Internet economy
unfair competition
referee points
