期刊文献+

“备不足而险患生”:盈余管理动机、贷款损失准备与银行风险 被引量:4

"Inadequate Provision May Result in Disaster":Earnings Management Motivation,Loan Loss Provision,and Bank Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以2001~2016年177家商业银行为样本,采用面板回归及中介效应模型,实证检验管理层盈余管理动机、贷款损失准备和银行风险的作用机制,结果表明,当存在盈余管理动机时,银行管理层会显著减少贷款损失准备的规模,而贷款损失准备的减少会导致银行风险增大。进一步检验发现,在银行管理层盈余管理动机与银行风险扩张之间,贷款损失准备的下降起到了显著的中介作用,且在地方性银行和非“四大”会计事务所审计的银行中更为明显。因此,商业银行应建立更为有效的内外部监督机制,提高银行治理水平。 Using 177 commercial banks from 2001 to 2016 as samples,this study empirically tested the mechanisms of the management team s earnings management motivation,loan loss provision,and bank risk using panel regression and mediation models.The results showed that in the presence of earnings management motivation,banksx management teams significantly reduce loan loss provision,whereas a reduction in loan loss provision results in an increase in bank risk.Further tests showed that a reduction in loan loss provision has a significant mediation effect on the relationship between the earnings management motivation of banksx management teamsx and bank risk,and this effect is more obvious among local banks and banks audited by non-"Big Four"accounting firms.Hence,commercial banks should establish a more effective internal and external supervision mechanism to enhance the level of bank governance.
作者 汪峰 王佳 王帆 Wang Feng;Wang Jia;Wang Fan(School of Economics and Management,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China;Xinxiang University,Xinxiang,Henan 435000,China;School of Accounting,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310018,China)
出处 《金融经济学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期83-92,共10页 Financial Economics Research
基金 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY18G020006) 国家社会科学基金青年项目(18CGL039) 国家自然科学基金项目(71973101) 教育部霍英东教育基金会第十六届高等院校青年教师基金(161081) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(22120190103) 同济大学重点建设项目(190164)。
关键词 盈余管理动机 贷款损失准备 银行风险 earnings management motivation loan loss provision bank risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献76

  • 1陈小悦,徐晓东.股权结构、企业绩效与投资者利益保护[J].经济研究,2001,36(11):3-11. 被引量:785
  • 2孙天琦,杨岚.有关银行贷款损失准备制度的调查报告——以我国五家上市银行为例的分析[J].金融研究,2005(6):116-130. 被引量:64
  • 3[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104 被引量:1
  • 4[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June 被引量:1
  • 5[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972 被引量:1
  • 6[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321 被引量:1
  • 7[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619 被引量:1
  • 8[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182 被引量:1
  • 9[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312 被引量:1
  • 10[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64 被引量:1

共引文献8557

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部