期刊文献+

3D-CT和3D-MRI诊断肩关节关节盂骨缺损 被引量:2

3D-CT and 3D-MRI in diagnosis of shoulder joint glenoid defect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较三维CT(3D-CT)和三维MRI(3D-MRI)诊断肩关节肩盂骨质缺损(GBL)的价值。方法对50例肩关节不稳定患者行3D-CT和3D-MR扫描,比较分析两者测得的关节盂面积、GBL面积及GBL程度;术中采用数字卡钳测量所有患者GBL程度,以之作为金标准,对3D-CT和3D-MRI结果进行一致性检验,判断其诊断性能。结果3D-CT测量的最佳拟合圆表面积大于3D-MRI,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3D-CT和3D-MRI测量GBL表面积和GBL程度差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。线性回归分析结果显示,两者测得的最佳拟合圆表面积的回归系数为1.06(R 2=0.78);而GBL表面积之间的回归系数为1.05(R 2=0.88)。3D-CT和3D-MRI测得的GBL程度与术中测量结果的一致性较好(Kappa=0.82、0.88,P均<0.05)。结论3D-MRI和3D-CT诊断肩关节GBL效果相当;3D-MRI具有替代3D-CT于术前更全面、无辐射评估SI患者GBL情况的潜在可能。 Objective To compare the value of three dimensional CT(3D-CT)and three-dimensional MRI(3D-MRI)in diagnosing shoulder glenoid bone loss(GBL).Methods Totally 50 patients with shoulder instability(SI)underwent 3D-CT and 3D-MR examinations.Glenoid surface area,GBL surface area and degree of GBL measured with 3D-CT and 3D-MRI were comparatively analyzed.Digital calipers was used to measure GBL of all patients during operation,and the data were analyzed with Kappa test to observe diagnostic performance of 3D-CT and 3D-MRI.Results The best fitting circle surface area with 3D-CT was larger than that with 3D-MRI,but there was no significant difference(P>0.05).There was no significant difference of GBL surface area nor degree of GBL acquired using two methods(both P>0.05).According to linear regression analysis,the regression coefficient of the best fitting circular surface area was 1.06(R 2=0.78)between 3D-CT and 3D-MRI,of GBL surface area was 1.05(R 2=0.88).GBL degree measured with 3D-CT and 3D-MRI was in good agreement with intraoperative measurement results(Kappa=0.82,P<0.05;Kappa=0.88,P<0.05).Conclusion 3D-CT and 3D-MRI have the same value in diagnosis of shoulder GBL.3D-MRI has the potential to take place of 3D-CT for providing full and non-radiative pre-operative evaluation of GBL in SI patients.
作者 张景忠 齐英杰 陈宇 丁晖 徐坚民 ZHANG Jingzhong;QI Yingjie;CHEN Yu;DING Hui;XU Jianmin(Department of Radiology,Shenzhen People's Hospital,the Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University,Shenzhen 518020,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期130-133,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 肩关节不稳定 体层摄影术 X线计算机 磁共振成像 shoulder joint joint instability tomography X-ray computed magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1朱以明,姜春岩,王满宜.复发性肩关节前方不稳定的诊断与治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(2):166-171. 被引量:23
  • 2Habermeyer P, Ebert T. Current status and perspectives of shoulder replacement. Unfallchirurg, 1999, 102(9): 668-683. 被引量:1
  • 3Boileau P, Villalba M, Hery JY, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2006, 88(8): 1755-1763. 被引量:1
  • 4Kim SH, Ha KI, Kim SH. Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: open versus arthroscopic technique. Arthroscopy, 2002, 18(7): 755-763. 被引量:1
  • 5Cole BJ, L'Insalata J, lrrgang J, et al. Comparison of arthroscopic and open anterior shoulder stabilization. A two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2000, 82-A(8): 1108-1114. 被引量:1
  • 6Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, et al. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy, 2004, 20(5): 456-462. 被引量:1
  • 7Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, et al. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart respair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2000, 82(1): 35-46. 被引量:1
  • 8Abboud J, Soslowsky LJ. Interplay of the static and dynamic restraints in glenohumeral instability. Ctin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, (400): 48-57. 被引量:1
  • 9Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, et al. Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohurneral instability. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85-A(5): 878-884. 被引量:1
  • 10Bushnell BD, Creighton RA, Herring MM. Bony instability of the shoulder. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(9): 1061-1073. 被引量:1

共引文献21

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部