摘要
作为“枫桥经验”的创新实践,诉源治理是当前地方法院源头治理纠纷的重要改革方向。从功能主义视角分析,该改革方案具备正当性。然而,以Q市为考察对象,发现既有的实践存在有损法官“中立”角色、超出能动司法界限的伦理风险、架空立案登记制、模糊诉中调解与和解的界限、冲击国家机关职能分工的法治风险,以及诱发纠纷非实质性化解、人案矛盾非有效缓解的技术风险。遏制地方法院诉源治理失范趋势,需要以对“司法为民”辩证解释为逻辑前提,在主观层面强调法院的非中心地位和司法裁判功能为先,在客观层面,在法院资源二分与差别化绩效考核的基础上,强调治理理念在司法裁判中的融入、司法社会工作在网格化治理中的嵌入。
As an innovative practice of“Feng Qiao Experience”,governance at the source of litigations is an important reform direction for the current local courts at the fountainhead management of disputes.From the perspective of functionalism,the reform is justified.However,taking Q city as the object of investigation,it is found that the current practice has some risks.First,it has the ethical risks of impairing the judge’s“neutral”role and exceeding the limits of active judicial.Second,it has the legal risks of damaging the registration system,obscuring the boundary between mediation and reconciliation,and influencing the functions of state organs.Third,it has the technical risks of resolving disputes and relieving the shortage of staff immaterially.To curb the risk of governance at the source of litigations,it is necessary to use the dialectical interpretation of“judicial for the people”as a logical premise,and emphasize the non-central status of the court and the important position of trial function in the subjective aspect.In the objective aspect,on the basis of the dichotomy of court’s resource and differential performance appraisal,it is necessary to emphasize the integration of governance in judicial trials and the embedding of judicial social work in grid governance.
作者
周苏湘
ZHOU Su-xiang(Southeast University)
出处
《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第1期28-37,共10页
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家重点研发计划“面向诉讼全流程的一体化便民服务技术及装备研究”(2018YFC0830200)暨江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助
关键词
诉源治理
源头治理
法院
功能主义
governance at the source of litigations
the fountainhead management of disputes
court
functionalism
