期刊文献+

医患矛盾下专断医疗的刑法容许性 被引量:1

Criminal Law Admissibility of Arbitrary Medical Treatment under the Contradiction between Doctors and Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在医患关系深刻对立的现实背景下,大行其道的"患者知情同意权"并非治本之策,相应之下,专断医疗刑法容许性的界限问题值得反思。面对专断医疗的出入罪之争,要以厘清医疗行为的正当化依据为基点,总结出"优越利益说"的理论优势,但需注意必须全面优越利益的事前衡量,而患者的知情同意便是其重要标准之一。因此,专断医疗一般不进入刑法视野,只有当损害其优越利益时才运用刑事制裁。 Under the reality of the deep opposition between doctors and patients,the popular"patient informed consent"is not a cure-up policy.Correspondingly,the boundary problem of the admissibility of criminal law about unauthorized medical treatment is worthy of reflection.In the face of the dispute over the sin of unauthorized medical treatment,based on clarifying the justification basis of medical behavior,summed up the theoretical advantages of the Superior Interest Theory.However,it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that the overall superiority must be measured beforehand,and the patient’s informed consent right is one of its important criteria.Therefore,unauthorized medical treatment does not generally enter the field of criminal law,and only use criminal sanctions when it damages its superior interests.
作者 李一凡 LI Yi-fan(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,China)
出处 《河南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第6期101-106,共6页 Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
关键词 专断医疗 患者知情同意权 优越利益 unauthorized medical treatment patient’s informed consent right superior interest
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献59

共引文献61

同被引文献19

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部