期刊文献+

腹腔镜与机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肾门肿瘤的疗效比较 被引量:5

Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: comparison of perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜下肾部分切除术(LPN)与机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾部分切除术(RAPN)对于处理肾门肿瘤的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2015年8月~2018年12月在我院行肾部分切除手术的109例肾门肿瘤患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为LPN组(n=59)和RAPN组(n=50)。LPN组男38例,女21例;年龄(56.4±14.2)岁;BMI(25.1±3.8) kg/m^2;肿瘤中位最大径3.8(1.7~5.8) cm;R.E.N.A.L.评分(8.6±1.9)分;术前肌酐(68.1±24.5)μmol/L,估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)为(91.3±22.4) ml/min。RAPN组男28例,女22例;年龄(58.5±11.6)岁;BMI(24.7±4.2) kg/m^2;肿瘤中位最大径4.3(1.4~6.9);R.E.N.A.L.评分(9.3±1.8)分;术前肌酐(64.5±19.7)μmol/L,eGFR(94.3±23.5) ml/min。LPN组和RAPN组患者在年龄、性别、BMI、术前肌酐、术前eGFR、肿瘤最大径及R.E.N.A.L.评分方面比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。分析两组患者术中手术方式改变、术中手术时间、肾脏热缺血时间、出血量、术中术后输血等围手术期和随访情况方面的差异。结果:LPN组59例中,3例因术中发现肾门肿瘤与肾动脉粘连明显,2例因缝合后创面大量渗血无法很好止血,故予以行腹腔镜下根治性肾切除术;2例患者因术中出血明显致视野不清,遂改开放肾部分切除术。RAPN组50例中,仅1例(2.0%)因肾门肿瘤浸润肾动脉故改行根治性肾切除术。LPN组术中更改手术方式的比例明显高于RAPN组[11.9%(7/59)vs.2.0%(1/50),P<0.05]。剔除术中手术方式改变病例后,LPN组(52例)和RAPN组(49例)在手术时间[(204.5±64.7) min vs.(156.8±54.9) min]、热缺血时间[(28.5±9.2) min vs.(22.4±6.5)min]、术中出血量[(258.4±88.6) ml vs.(154.6±78.8) ml]和术中术后输血率[30.8%(16/52)vs.10.2%(5/49)]方面比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。此外,RAPN组患者术后引流管留置时间和术后住院时间均明显短于LPN组(P<0.05)。LPN组和RAPN组随访时间比较差异无统计学意义[21.5(1.2~39.2)个月vs.16.5(0 Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy(LPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy(RAPN) for renal hilar tumors. Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted based on the perioperative clinical data of 109 patients who underwent nephron sparing surgery(RAPN versus LPN) for renal hilar tumor at the first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University between August 2015 and December 2018. There were 38 males and 21 females in LPN group. Their age was(56.4±14.2) years old. The body mass index(BMI) was(25.1±3.8) kg/m^2. The median tumor size was 3.8(1.7-5.8) cm. The R.E.N.A.L.score was(8.6±1.9). The preoperative serum creatinine was(68.1±24.5) μmol/L and the estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) was(91.3±22.4) ml/min. There were 28 males and 22 females in RAPN group. Their age was(58.5±11.6) years old. BMI was(24.7±4.2) kg/m^2. The median tumor size was 4.3(1.4-6.9) cm. The R.E.N.A.L. score was(9.3±1.8). The preoperative serum creatinine was(64.5±19.7) μmol/L and eGFR was(94.3±23.5) ml/min. There was no difference in the age, gender, BMI, preoperative serum creatinine, eGFR, tumor size or R.E.N.A.L. score. The operating time, warm ischemia time(WIT), intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, the change of surgery, pathological result and follow-up status were compared between LPN and RAPN group. Result: In LPN group(n=59) the surgery type was changed due to several reasons. Three cases of renal hilar tumor and renal artery adhesion were found during operation. In 2 cases,a large amount of bleeding happened and was not able to stop after suturing. Therefore, laparoscopic radical nephrectomies were performed. Two patients were performed with open partial nephrectomy because of intraoperative bleeding and unclear vision. Of the 50 patients in the RAPN group, only 1(2.0%) had a radical nephrectomy due to invasion of the renal tumor into the renal artery. The rate of intraoperative changes in the LPN group was significantly higher than tha
作者 夏佳东 王仪春 薛建新 李鹏超 邵鹏飞 秦超 宋宁宏 杨杰 王增军 XIA Jiadong;WANG Yichun;XUE Jianxin;LI Pengchao;SHAO Pengfei;QIN Chao;SONG Ninghong;YANG Jie;WANG Zengjun(Department of Urology,First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,210029,China)
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2019年第11期850-856,共7页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 肾门肿瘤 肾部分切除术 腹腔镜 机器人 renal hilar tumor partial nephrectomy laparoscopy robot
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献68

共引文献140

同被引文献23

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部