摘要
《电子商务法》具有自身特殊的调整对象和范围,其中,第38条第2款规定的审核义务或者安全保障义务对应的权利主体特指三方主体关系下的"消费者"。实践中争议比较大的电子商务平台经营者的相应责任应当属于民事责任,而且是一种包容性的民事责任,既可能是补充责任,少数情形下也可能是连带责任或者按份责任,具体应根据电子商务平台经营者的审核或者安全保障义务内容及相关实际情形进行判断。从《电子商务法》第38条的内部关系上看,第1款的连带责任是基于主观的共同侵权行为,而第2款可能构成的连带责任是基于客观的共同侵权行为,两者具有明显的界分,在适用中不能混淆。
E-commerce Law has its own special adjustment object and scope, among which the right subject corresponding to the audit obligation or security obligation specified in paragraph 2 of article 38, refers to the ’consumer’ under the tripartite subject relationship. In practice, the corresponding liability of operators of e-commerce platforms with great disputes should belong to civil liability, and it is an inclusive civil liability, which may be either supplementary liability, or joint and several liability or by share liability in a few cases. The specific judgment should be based on the content of the audit or security obligation of operators of e-commerce platforms and the relevant actual situation. From the perspective of the internal relationship of article 38 of the E-commerce Law, the joint and several liability that may be constituted by paragraph 1 is based on subjective joint tort, while the joint and several liability of paragraph 2 is based on objective joint tort, which has obvious boundary and cannot be confused in the application.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期282-300,共19页
China Legal Science
