期刊文献+

锁定钢板治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折的临床效果 被引量:2

Clinical Effect of Locking Plate in the Treatment of Complex Proximal Humerus Fracture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析锁定钢板在复杂肱骨近端骨折治疗中的临床效果。方法方便选取2014年1月-2017年12月在该院就诊的复杂肱骨近端骨折患者56例,依照数字随机表法将其分成对照组及观察组,每组28例,对照组予以LPHP方案治疗,观察组予以PHILOS治疗,分析组间治疗效果差异。结果观察组术中出血量(40.85±32.84)m L及骨折愈合时间(12.67±2.52)d均显著低于对照组的(71.56±6.90)mL、(18.76±3.34)d,组间数据差异有统计学意义(t=20.579、7.702,P<0.05);观察组术后6个月肩关节外旋、前屈、外展及内旋活动度分别为(44.52±3.51)°、(115.87±5.69)°、(128.57±4.58)°、(45.95±4.42)°显著高于对照组的(41.08±3.17)°、(103.84±4.88)°、(121.46±4.29)°、(41.81±4.05)°,组间数据差异有统计学意义(t=5.669、8.492、5.995、3.654,P<0.05);观察组术后12个ASES、VAS、UCLA及SST评分分别为(78.84±5.57)分、(1.01±0.49)分、(31.51±1.68)分、(8.19±1.04)分,与对照组的(77.49±4.91)分、(1.22±0.52)分、(30.94±1.73)分、(7.79±0.95)分之间数据差异无统计学意义(t=0.962、1.555、1.251、1.503,P>0.05);观察组术后6个月切口感染率3.57%、切口延迟愈合率0.00%、钢板松动率0.00%、肩关节僵硬率0.00%均稍低于对照组的7.14%、3.57%、7.14%、3.57%(χ2=0.352、1.018、2.074、1.018,P>0.05)。结论在复杂肱骨近端骨折切开复位内固定术中予以锁定钢板有助于加速患者康复,临床价值较好。 Objective To analyze the clinical effect of locking plate in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures.Methods A total of 56 patients with complicated proximal humeral fractures who were Convenient treated in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2017 were enrolled. The patients were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the numerical random table method. Each group had 28 cases, and the control group was given LPHP. In the treatment of the regimen, the observation group was treated with PHILOS, and the difference in treatment effect between the groups was analyzed. Results The intraoperative blood loss(40.85±32.84)mL and fracture healing time(12.67±2.52)d were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(71.56±6.90)mL,(18.76±3.34)d. Statistical significance(t=20.579, 7.702, P<0.05);the external rotation, flexion, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder joint in the observation group were(44.52 ±3.51)°,(115.87 ±5.69),(128.57 ±4.58)°,(45.95 ±4.42)° significantly higher than the control group(41.08 ± 3.17)°,(103.84 ± 4.88)°,(121.46 ± 4.29)°,(41.81±4.05)°, there were statistically significant differences between the groups(t=5.669, 8.492, 5.995, 3.654, P<0.05). The scores of 12 ASES, VAS, UCLA and SST in the observation group were(78.84±5.57) points and(1.01±0.49)points,(31.51±1.68) points,(8.19±1.04)points, and(77.49±4.91)points,(1.22±0.52)points,(30.94±1.73)points, and(7.79±0.95)points of the control group. There was no significant difference between the data(t=0.962, 1.555, 1.251, 1.503, P>0.05);the incision infection rate was 3.57% in the observation group at 6 months after operation, and the incision delayed healing rate of 0.00%, 0.00% loosing, shoulder stiffness were slightly lower than 0.00%and 7.14%, 3.57%, 7.14%, 3.57% in the control group(χ~2=0.352,1.018,2.074,1.018, P>0.05). Conclusion Locking the plate in the open reduction and internal fixation of the proximal humerus fracture is helpful to acce
作者 蔡俊雄 CAI Jun-xiong(Department of Orthopaedics,Yong'an Municipal Hospital,Sanming,Fujian Province,366000 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2019年第31期38-40,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 锁定钢板 复杂巩固近端骨折 治疗效果 Locking plate Complex consolidation of proximal fracture Treatment effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献51

  • 1徐科峰,李强.MIPPO技术结合锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2013,16(1):76-78. 被引量:21
  • 2黄强,王满宜,荣国威.复杂肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(3):159-164. 被引量:198
  • 3Clement ND, Duckworth AD, McQueen MM, et al. The outcome of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: predictors of mortality and function [J]. Bone Joint J, 2014,96-B(7):970-977. 被引量:1
  • 4Relneck JR, Krishnan SG, Burkhead WZ. Four - part proximal hume- rus fractures: evaluation and treatment [ J]. Hand Clin, 2007,23 (4) :415 -424. 被引量:1
  • 5Chen H, Ji X, Zhang Q, et al. Clinical outcomes of allograft with loc- king compression plates for elderly four - part proximal humerus frac- tures[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2015,10(1):114. 被引量:1
  • 6Schliemann B, Wihnert D, Theisen C, et al. How to enhance the sta- bility of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures? An over- view of current biomechanical and clinical data[J]. Injury, 2015,46 (7) : 1207 - 1214. 被引量:1
  • 7Bockmann B, Buecking B, Franz D, et al. Mid - term results of a less - invasive locking plate fixation method for proximal humeral frac- tures: a prospective observational study[ J]. BMC Musculoskelet Dis- ord, 2015,4(16) :160. 被引量:1
  • 8Konrad G, Audig6 L, Lambert S, et al. Similar outcomes for nail ver- sus plate fixation of three - part proximal humeral fractures [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat IRes, 2012,470 ( 2 ) : 602 - 609. 被引量:1
  • 9von RUden C, Trapp O, Hierholzer C, et al. Intramedullary nailing vs. locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures: long - term outcome [ J ]. Unfallchirurg, 2015,118 ( 8 ) :686 - 692. 被引量:1
  • 10Kralinger F, Blauth M, Goldhahn J, et al. The influence of local bone density on the outcome of one hundred and fifty proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014,18 ;96(12) :1026 - 1032. 被引量:1

共引文献100

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部