摘要
目的探析围手术期优质护理干预经输尿管镜钬激光碎石术患者的效果。方法选取本院泌尿外科2016年1月至2018年12月期间的82例经输尿管镜钬激光碎石的患者,随机分为对照组37例行围手术期常规护理干预,观察组45例行围手术期优质护理干预,对比分析两组患者在围手术期护理干预后的疗效、症状消失时间、住院持续时间以及不良反应。结果经围手术期护理干预后的观察组的痊愈率57.8%远高于常规护理的对照组29.7%,在疗效的总有效率方面,前者97.8%比后者81.1%更有改善(P<0.05);观察组在症状消失时间和住院持续时间方面比对照组明显降低(P<0.05);观察组无血尿,而对照组则有13.5%的患者出现血尿(P<0.05)。观察组有8.9%的患者出现发热,而对照组则有32.4%的患者出现发热(P<0.05)。结论对患者实施围手术期的优质护理干预至关重要,在本研究中取得了很好的效果,值得推广应用。
Objective To investigate the effect of perioperative high-quality nursing intervention in patients undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy.Methods Eighty-two patients undergoing ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy from January 2016 to December 2018 in our hospital,37 patients were randomly divided into control group who underwent perioperative routine nursing intervention,and 45 patients in the observation group.Perioperative quality nursing intervention,comparative analysis of the efficacy of the two groups of patients after perioperative nursing intervention,time to disappear symptoms,length of hospital stay and adverse reactions.Results The recovery rate of the observation group after perioperative nursing intervention was 57.8%,which was much higher than that of the control group(29.7%).In terms of the total effective rate,the former was 97.8%more improved than the latter(81.1%)(P<0.05);The observation group was significantly lower than the control group in the time of symptom disappearance and hospitalization duration(P<0.05);the observation group had no hematuria,while the control group had 13.5%of patients with hematuria(P<0.05).In the observation group,8.9%of the patients developed fever,while in the control group,32.4%of the patients developed fever(P<0.05).Conclusion It is very important to implement perioperative quality nursing intervention for patients.It has achieved good results in this study and it is worthy of popularization and application.
作者
彭镜
朱丽丽
PENG Jing;ZHU Li-li(Urology Surgery,Nanjing Mingji Hospital,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210000)
出处
《智慧健康》
2019年第32期66-69,共4页
Smart Healthcare
