摘要
楚简“■”之类字形学者多释为“■/毄/擊”。此释可备一说,但无法说清构字理据。“■”或为“撞”字异体,可以同义换读为“击/擊”。《鲍叔牙与隰朋之谏》中的“”或可读“诟治”,意思是对君臣治政之失进行责詈。六国文字“幹”为“倝”的变形声化字;秦汉以来的“榦”字俗体字形“幹”来源于秦文字,俗体“幹”为“榦”的变形声化字。
“”on Chu bamboo slips is usually interpreted as“/毄/擊”.Such interpretation can be reserved,but it fails to provide clear reasons and evidences for the character configuration.“”can be regarded as the variant form of“撞”,meanwhile it can be pronounced as“击/擊”(jī)without changing its original meaning.In Bao Shuya and Xi Peng’s Suggestion,“”can be read as“诟治”(gòu zhì)which has the sense of scolding monarch and ministers for their misgovernment.During the Warring State era,“幹”was used as the character of Bianxingshenghua for“倝”.“榦”could be written as“幹”which was the common variant originating from the Qin and Han Dynasties,yet the common word“幹”was also used as the character of Bianxingshenghua for“榦”.
作者
俞绍宏
YU Shao-hong(Research Center for the Inheritance,Dissemination and Education Chinese Characters Civilization,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出处
《大连大学学报》
2019年第5期32-39,共8页
Journal of Dalian University
基金
国家社科基金“战国古文与敦煌先秦写卷俗字对比研究”(17BYY020)