期刊文献+

以人民为中心的双重代表模式——兼及政治代表中“利益”与“意志”的调和 被引量:14

The People-Centered Dual Representation Mode:Reconciliation of “Interests” and “Will” in Political Representation
原文传递
导出
摘要 人民与代表在政治理论与政治修辞中常常紧密关联,几乎所有的现代政府均宣称它们在代表人民行使权力。但人民与代表之间的关系尚缺乏足够清晰的理论说明,这严重妨碍了我们对现代政治秩序与政治代表过程的理解。从人民与代表概念的学术和日常语境来看,作为主权者的人民实际上是通过两种不同的方式与代表关联在一起的:其一,人民以代表者的身份代表着分散的民众;其二,人民又作为被代表者被其代理人以"代行为"的方式所代表。我们可以由此阐明一种以人民为中心的双重代表模式。该模式借助于作为主权者的人民所具有的公共性,为调和传统政治代表模式尤其是西方代议制民主模式中利益代表与意志代表的持久冲突提供了新的思路。 The people and representation are often closely linked in political rhetoric,and almost all modern regimes claim that they wield power on behalf of their people. However,the relationship between the people and representation still lacks clear theoretical explanation,which seriously hampers our understanding of modern political order and political representation process. In the academic as well as daily contexts,the sovereign people are actually associated with their representation in two different ways. Firstly,the people as the representatives represent the dispersed multitude. Secondly,the people as the represented are represented by their agents in the form of"representing as acting for."We can therefore propose a new mode of political representation:the people-centered dual representation. This mode,underpinned by the publicity implicated in the sovereign people,provides a new way of thinking for reconciling the long-lasting conflicts between interests and will in political representation,especially in the western representative democratic system.
作者 谭安奎 张旭斌 Tan Ankui;Zhang Xubin(Center for Chinese Public Administration Research,Sun Yat-sen University;School of Government,Sun Yat-sen University)
出处 《开放时代》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期96-107,M0006,共13页 Open Times
基金 国家哲学社会科学项目“主体性权利与西方现代政治哲学中的‘人民’建构问题研究”(18BZX115)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 人民 双重代表 利益 意志 公共性 the people dual representation interests will publicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献272

  • 1尹福瑛.一九六一年田家英浙江农村调研[J].百年潮,2002(12):33-37. 被引量:2
  • 2孟德斯鸠.《论法的精神》上册.张雁深译.北京:商务印书馆,1995年,第15、17页. 被引量:6
  • 3Robert Livingston, Speech in New York ratifying convention, June 19, 1788, in Elliot, ed., The Debates of the Several State Conventions, vol.Ⅱ, pp. 209-210. 被引量:1
  • 4Samuel Adams to John Adams, 20 Nov., 1790, in Adams, ed., The Works of John Adams, vol. Ⅵ, p. 421. 被引量:1
  • 5Wise, A Vindication of the Government of New-England Churches, p. 61. 被引量:1
  • 6Elisha Williams, "The Essential Rights and Liberties of Protestants, " in Morgan, ed. , Puritan Political Ideas, p. 272. 被引量:1
  • 7William Paca to the Citizen, February 15, 1787, in Yazawa, ed., Representative Government and the Revolution, p. 61. 被引量:1
  • 8Pittsfield Petition, May 29, 1776, in Oscar and Mary Handlin, eds. , Popular Sources of Political Authority, pp. 90-91. 被引量:1
  • 9Returns of the Towns: Norton, in Oscar and Mary Handlin, eds. , Popular Sources of Political Authority, pp. 124-125. 被引量:1
  • 10Returns of the Towns: Lexington,in Oscar and Mary Handlin, eds. , Popular Sources of Political Authority, pp. 149-151. 被引量:1

共引文献120

引证文献14

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部