摘要
文章从比较的视角来考察斯洛特和王阳明两种不同的"心学"理论。斯洛特用中国哲学的"心"(heart-mind)来重新界定西方传统的"心灵"(the mind)概念,反对理性主义把心灵作为纯理智活动的观点,认为所有心灵活动都包含情感因素,所有理智活动都可还原为情感或情感属性,而王阳明认为心即先天的良知。斯洛特认为他的心灵概念与中国传统思想中的心概念相一致,并能够为中国思想中理智与情感相融的心学预设提供哲学论证,而阳明心学也可以从情感主义角度进行分析和论证,但前者的"情感"和"心学"更多呈现出当代情感主义的基本特质,通过经验性的移情和同情发挥作用,而后者更注重情理交融、以情为主的先验性与直觉性。从比较的视角来分析,可以在情感主义伦理学框架下为理解两种"心学"理论开拓出更大的空间和可能性。
From a comparative perspective this article is intended to examine the similarities and differences between the two theories of the heart mind,namely,the concept of“mind”as“xin”(“heart-mind”)provided by contemporary American philosopher Michael Slote and the‘learning of the heart-mind’(xin xue)by Confucian idealist philosopher Wang Yangming.The former opposes rationalism in which the mind is a purely intellectual activity and holds that all mental activities contain emotional factors and all intellectual activities can be reduced to emotion or emotional attributes,while the latter defines the heart-mind as the innately good knowledge.While both concepts of the heart mind tend to highlight the importance of sentiment rather than intellect,their understandings of the sentiment differs significantly which lead to two different types of‘sentimental theories'of the heart-mind,one to be facilitated by empirical empathy and sympathy while the other to be metaphysically justified by the innately good heart-mind.The comparison opens up more space for us to understand Slote's and Wang Yangming's views on the heart-mind in the light of sentimental ethics.
作者
姚新中
张燕
YAO Xinzhong;ZHANG Yan(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872;School of Marxism,Ocean University of China,Qingdao,Shandong 266100)
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期44-51,共8页
Journal of Renmin University of China
基金
贵州省2017年度哲学社会科学规划国学单列课题“阳明心学与当代社会心理学研究”(17GZGX06)
关键词
斯洛特
王阳明
情感主义
心学
Michael Slote
Wang Yangming
Sentimentalism
The heart-mind
