摘要
有关职业竞技体育侵权法律规制的缺失,使得司法实践中自甘风险的适用出现乱象。考虑到自甘风险理论的实质是受害人对于预期风险的评估及侵害者对于预期风险的管控问题,自甘风险应当在《侵权责任法》第26条与有过失条款中加以解释,交由法院衡量当事人对损害的发生或扩大的原因力,从而合理确定分配其责任。自甘风险的适用不能以概括条款的方式进行,应受个案的限制,通过具体类型适用的方法就不同情形下如何认定侵害人以及受害人对于损害发生的原因力分别进行了分析,同时就可能影响自甘风险份额大小的各个因素进行列举,以期在当前法律框架中较好地解决自甘风险法律适用问题。
The lack of legal regulation of professional competitive sports infringement makes the chaos of the assumption of risk in judicial practice.Considering that the essence of the assumption of risk theory is the victim s assessment of the expected risk and the infringer s control over the expected risk,the assumption of risk should be explained according to Article 26 of Tort Liability Law and the error and omission clause,and the court shall measure the cause of the occurrence or expansion of the damage by the parties,so as to reasonably determine the liability for each party.However,the application of the assumption of risk should not be carried out according to general clauses,but should be limited by the individual case.This paper analyzes how to identify the infringer s and the victim s causal force in different situations by applying specific types.At the same time,this paper enumerates the various factors that may affect the degree of assumption of risk,in order to better solve the problem of legal application of the assumption of risk in the current legal framework.
作者
周卓晗
Zhou Zhuohan(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215021)
出处
《嘉兴学院学报》
2019年第5期134-139,共6页
Journal of Jiaxing University
关键词
职业竞技体育
侵权
解释论
自甘风险
professional competitive sports
infringement
explanatory theory
assumption of risk
