期刊文献+

经肌间隙和经皮入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较经肌间隙和经皮入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年3月至2017年3月期间因胸腰椎骨折在浙江中医药大学附属温州市中西医结合医院脊柱外科住院手术治疗患者43例,其中男性29例,女性14例,平均年龄41.5岁;分别采用经肌间隙入路(26例)和经皮入路(17例)椎弓根螺钉内固定手术,分为肌间隙组和经皮组,比较两组患者手术时间、出血量、术中透视次数、疼痛评分、手术前后伤椎高度等指标。结果两组患者相比,肌间隙组手术时间更短,透视次数更少,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经皮组出血更少,疼痛更轻,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者手术后、末次随访伤椎高度、末次随访ODI评分无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论经肌间隙和经皮入路治疗胸腰椎骨折具有良好的、相似的远期疗效,但是围手术期有各自的优势,需综合考虑权衡选择手术方式。
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2019年第4期779-781,共3页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1968, 50: 919-926. 被引量:1
  • 2Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine, 1997, 22: 1018-1023. 被引量:1
  • 3Thesleff S, Ward MR. Studies on the mechanism of fibrillation potentials in denervated muscle. J Physiol, 1975, 244: 313-323. 被引量:1
  • 4Watkins MB. Posterolateral bonegrafting for fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1959, 41: 388-396. 被引量:1
  • 5Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine, 2002, 27: E29-36. 被引量:1
  • 6Shindo H. Anatomical study of the lumbar muhifidus muscle and its innervation in human adults and fetuses. Nippon Ika Daigaku Zasshi, 1995, 62: 439-446. 被引量:1
  • 7Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lmnbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine, 1996, 21: 2683-2688. 被引量:1
  • 8Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguehi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance afler posterior lumbar surgery. Spine, 1999, 24: 1023-1028. 被引量:1
  • 9Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et aI. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine, 2004, 29: 1938-1944. 被引量:1
  • 10Wihse LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine, 1988, 13: 696-706. 被引量:1

共引文献234

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部