摘要
2016年以来,多个传统上积极推动全球化的国家(如美国、英国等)出现了逆全球化的强烈主张,并已经在政策方面得到部分实现。中国以往取得的国际经贸发展成果与尊重和追随全球化的主流密不可分。在以往的对外缔约和谈判中,主要扮演的是追随者和参与者的角色。然而,在美欧引领的国际经贸规则发展停滞甚至回退、国际经贸摩擦可能进一步加剧的背景下,中国有必要更多地从规则引领者角度重新审视中国基本定位和政策,使其与国家战略和国内发展政策更趋一致,利用双边模式进行竞争,寻求在双边层面加强与美国、英国、欧盟等国家(组织)的合作,并通过'一带一路'、《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP)、二十国集团等平台将其作用向多边扩散。
Since 2016,a number of countries that had traditionally actively promoted globalization(such as U.S., U.K. and others) have been strongly advocated against globalization, and some of measures have been implemented in practice. The past achievements of China in international economic and trade developments are inseparable to adapting the mainstream of globalization. In the previous agreements and negotiations, China has primarily acts as followers and participants in accompanying with globalization. However, due to the stagnation of international trade and investment agreements led by the U.S. and the EU, China needs to reconsider the standpoint and policies from the perspective of a leader to make it better in compliance with the state strategy and domestic policy for developments. China needs to use bilateral treaties to strengthen its interests, to seek more cooperation with U.S., U.K., EU and other countries(or economic regions), and to expand multilateral proliferation by the Belt and Road Initiative("B&R"), Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership( "RCEP"), G20 and other platforms.
基金
作者主持的2014年上海市教育委员会科研创新项目“双边投资协定发展趋势与中国对策研究”(项目编号:14ZS001)
2012年上海社科青年项目“欧债危机背景下中国与欧盟贸易摩擦及对策研究”(项目编号:2012EFX001)
2014年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究中青年项目“大数据时代的信息安全法律保障研究”(项目编号:14SFB30039)的阶段性成果
关键词
逆全球化
国际经贸规则
中国立场
双边投资协定
De-globalization
International Trade and Investment Agreements
China’s Choice
Bilateral Investment Treaty
