期刊文献+

乡村教师政策后设评价的实施构想:目标和策略 被引量:2

Conception of Implementing Meta-evaluation of Rural Teachers’Policies: Objectives and Strategies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伴随政策科学的不断发展,后设评价越来越显现出重要价值。乡村教师政策后设评价由西方研究借鉴而来,其意义在于形成“后设评价→政策评估→教育政策→教育质量”的倒逼机制,进而推动乡村教育质量的提升。在乡村教师政策后设评价实施过程中,要把价值判断与技术分析相结合,尤其要注重把乡村教育中多方利益诉求相结合,遵循后设评价的基本操作模式,严格对照后设评价指标体系进行评估,着重从效用性、可行性、适当性和精确性等方面对乡村教师政策评估进行分析、判断。 With the development of policy science, meta-evaluation is becoming more and more important. The meta-evaluation of rural teachers policy is drawn from western research. Its significance lies in the formation of a backward mechanism of "meta-evaluation → policy evaluation → education policy → education quality", which promotes the improvement of rural education quality. In the process of implementing the meta-evaluation of rural teachers policy, we should grasp the goal of combining value judgment with technical analysis and integrating multiple interests in rural education, follow the basic operation mode of meta-evaluation, strictly contrast the meta-evaluation index system, and focus on the judgment of the utility, feasibility, propriety and accuracy of the policy evaluation of rural teachers.
作者 殷赵云 王斌 YIN Zhaoyun;WANG Bin(School of Literature and Journalism, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui 553001, China;School of Political Science and Public Administration, Southwest University, Chongqing 400717, China)
出处 《教师教育学报》 2019年第6期71-77,共7页 Journal of Teacher Education
基金 重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究重点项目“重庆市人才强市战略行动计划的人才政策研究”(18SKSJ002),项目负责人:王斌 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“基于层次分析法的县域乡村基础教育后设评价研究”(SWU1809343),项目负责人:殷赵云
关键词 乡村教师 政策评估 后设评价 价值判断 评价指标 rural teachers policy evaluation meta-evaluation value judgement evaluation index
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献11

  • 1刘冠生.城市、城镇、农村、乡村概念的理解与使用问题[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,21(1):54-57. 被引量:21
  • 2张梦中,马克.霍(MarcHozer).定性研究方法总论[J].中国行政管理,2001(11):39-42. 被引量:58
  • 3曹如军,叶泽滨.我国新时期的农村教师政策评析[J].教学与管理(中学版),2007(7):24-26. 被引量:8
  • 4[美]斯塔费尔比姆,等.评估模型[M].苏锦丽,等,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007:5-21. 被引量:1
  • 5Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S. & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983) Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation[ M ]. Boston : Kluwer - Nijhoff. 被引量:1
  • 6Fitzpartrick, J. L. , Sanders, J. R. ,& Worthen,B. R. (2004) Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (3rd ed. ) [ M ]. Boston/Allyn and Bacon : Pearson Ed- ucation. 被引量:1
  • 7苏锦丽.展望我国教育评鉴专业之发展[C].台湾师范大学教育研究中心举办“教育评鉴回顾与展望”学术研讨会论文集,2004.24-27. 被引量:1
  • 8Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (2001) Operating Procedures for the development and approval of standards of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation[ EB/OL]. From http ://www. wmich, edu/evalctr/jc/ Governance/Operproc. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9American Evaluation Association (2004) Guiding Prin- ciples for Evaluators [ EB/OL]. From http ://www. eval. org/Pub- lications/GuidingPrinciplesPrintable, asp. 被引量:1
  • 10潘毅,高岭.中美公共政策评估系统比较及启示[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2008(5):95-99. 被引量:15

共引文献28

同被引文献92

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部