期刊文献+

感知伴侣回应性量表中文版的信效度检验 被引量:19

Reliability and Validity Test of Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale in Chinese Version
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:修订国外感知伴侣回应性量表(Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale),检验其在中国伴侣关系中的信效度。方法:随机抽样,初测收到有效问卷618份,对其进行项目分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、效标效度分析和内部一致性分析。四周后对初测中愿意参与后续调查的被试进行重测,回收有效问卷61份,对其进行重测信度分析。结果:修订后的感知伴侣回应性量表维度结构与原量表一致,12个条目可以有效的聚合到一个公因子上。EFA和CFA指标表明单因素模型的拟合程度较好。感知伴侣回应性与关系满意度的相关系数为0.67,与依恋焦虑和依恋回避的相关系数分别为-0.45和-0.67。此外,感知回应性量表的内部一致性信度为0.90,重测信度为0.73。结论:感知伴侣回应性量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度,是测量我国成年伴侣间感知回应性的有效工具。 Objective: To revise Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale(PPRS)and examine its reliability and validity in Chinese adults. Methods: The Chinese version of PPRS was randomly distributed to adults who with romantic relationship on the internet. We collected data twice: the effective questionnaires were 618 in initial test. They were selected to complete the Chinese version of Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale for Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity analysis and internal consistency reliability analysis. After 4 weeks, 61 participants who were willing to participate follow-up survey were retested and selected for test-retest reliability. Results: There were 12 items in the PPRS, which was a single structural dimension. EFA and CAF showed that the single-factor model fitted well. The correlation coefficients between perceived responsiveness and relationship satisfaction, anxiety attachment,avoidance attachment were 0.67,-0.45,-0.67 respectively. The internal consistency reliability and retest reliability of the scale were 0.90 and 0.73. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the PPRS has good reliability and validity. It is an effective tool to measure the perceived responsiveness among Chinese adults with romantic relationships.
作者 杨舒程 王子祥 刘振亮 李岩松 YANG Shu-cheng;WANG Zi-xiang;LIU Zhen-liang;LI Yan-song(Department of Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;Institute for Brain Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第5期950-953,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(基金编号:31600929)资助
关键词 感知伴侣回应性 伴侣关系 信度 效度 Perceived partner responsiveness Intimate relationship Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献68

  • 1张文新,武建芬.Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订[J].心理发展与教育,1999,15(2):8-12. 被引量:231
  • 2周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3609
  • 3杨阿丽,方晓义,涂翠平,李红菊.父母冲突、青少年的认知评价及其与青少年社会适应的关系[J].心理与行为研究,2007,5(2):127-134. 被引量:38
  • 4Kenny D A,Kashy D A,Cook W L.Dyadic data analysis.New York:Guilford Press,2006. 被引量:1
  • 5Byrne D,Griffit W.Interpersonal attraction.Annual Review of Psychology,1973,24:317-336. 被引量:1
  • 6Morry M M.Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings:A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,2005,22(4):561-584. 被引量:1
  • 7Morry M M.The attraction-similarity hypothesis among cross-sex friends:Relationship satisfaction,perceived similarities,and self-serving perceptions.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,2007,24(1):117-138. 被引量:1
  • 8Gonzaga G C,Campos B,Bradburg T.Similarity,convergence,and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2007,93(1):34-48. 被引量:1
  • 9Lutz-Zois C J,Bradley A C,Mihalik J L,et al..Perceived similarity and relationship success among dating couples:An idiographic approach.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,2006,23(6):865-880. 被引量:1
  • 10Lee K,Ashton M C,Pozzebon J A,et al..Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well-acquainted person.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2009,96(2):460-472. 被引量:1

共引文献509

同被引文献166

引证文献19

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部